Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
27
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
10
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 16.9% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2020 15.8% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2019 4.6% 35 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2018 3.8% 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2017 12.6% 35 Financially Distressed Recovery
2016 14.3% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 12.5% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 47 Financially Distressed Recovery
2013 37 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Phayvanh Luekhamhan Executive Director 16.0% of Rev
Phillip Robertson Board Member
Allison Rogers Board Member
Elliott Bent Board President
John Landy Treasurer
Liz Benjamin Secretary
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
10 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
27 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 6 other orgs in VT with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 18 points below the peer median (10 vs. 28).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 35 → 27 over 5 years (declining by 8 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.