Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
50
Score
Governance
58
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 4.4% 50 Fragile Gov Risk
2022 58 Fragile Recovery
2021 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2020 58 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DAVID G TAYLOR Board President
MARY WILSON Board President
WILLIAM KORBEL Treasurer
ARTHUR ANDERSON Secretary
MARCO CHAVARRY Board Member
LOUISE VALENTIN Board Member
JOHN BALICH Board Member
THOMAS FLINT Board Member
PAT PUTNAM Board Member
RON SPEARS Board Member
DIANE RUZEVICH Board Member
DAVE GROSSE Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DAVID G TAYLOR Board President
WILLIAM KORBEL Treasurer
ARTHUR ANDERSON Secretary
JOHN BALICH Board Member
PHILIP BAUMAN Board Member
MEGAN BOWEN Board Member
MARCO CHAVARRY Board Member
THOMAS FLINT Board Member
PAT PUTNAM Board Member
LAURA ROBERTS Board Member
RON SPEARS Board Member
MARY WILSON Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
58 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
50 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 185 other orgs in MI with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 17 points above the peer median (45 vs. 28).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 58 → 50 over 4 years (declining by 8 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.