Steady State
What does this mean?
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
The Path Forward
The Stewardship
Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.
Title
Representative Institutions
Institutional Epochs
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Hidden | Hidden | — | — | Unknown | — | |
| 2023 | — | — | — | 49 | Fragile | Stable Watch | |
| 2022 | — | — | — | 52 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2021 | — | — | — | 46 | Fragile | Stable Watch | |
| 2020 | — | — | — | 46 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2017 | — | — | — | 45 | Fragile | Stable Watch | |
| 2016 | — | — | — | 45 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2015 | — | — | — | 37 | Fragile | Decline Risk | |
| 2014 | — | — | — | 47 | Fragile | Stable Watch |
Officer compensation history
Tax year 2025
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ERIC SUTTON | Board President | — | ||
| BRYAN CARNEY | Board President | — | ||
| CHAD DUFOUR | Board Member | — | ||
| DAWN WALSH | Treasurer | — | ||
| LISA DUFOUR | Secretary | — | ||
| STU CLARK | Board Member | — | ||
| STEVE AGNE | Board Member | — | ||
| DAN ROBERTS | Board Member | — | ||
| SHANNON DONOVAN | Board Member | — | ||
| ADAM BLANK | Board Member | — |
Tax year 2023
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TAMRA ROBERTS | Board President | — | ||
| BRYAN CARNEY | Board President | — | ||
| KELLY THOMAS | Treasurer | — | ||
| LISA DEFOUR | Secretary | — | ||
| TAMRA ROBERTS | Board President | — | ||
| BRYAN CARNEY | Board President | — | ||
| LISA DUFOUR | Board Member | — | ||
| KELLI THOMAS | Board Member | — | ||
| TAMRA ROBERTS | Board President | — | ||
| BRYAN CARNEY | Board President | — | ||
| JANELLE AXLINE | Treasurer | — | ||
| LISA DUFOUR | Board Member | — |
Score breakdown
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Compared to 4 other orgs in IA with NTEE prefix A8.
Most-divergent component: program score sits 14 points above the peer median (45 vs. 31).
5-year trend: Steady State
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
What's driving this score
- No individual risk drivers stand out. Overall score reflects component balance, not any single signal.
What would change this score
No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.