Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Acute Resource Divergence

What does this mean?

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

The Path Forward

The Realignment

Forces immediate balancing of administrative bloat against actual programmatic output. It demands that every dollar extracted for overhead be justified by community impact.

The Realignment
The Realignment
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Acute Resource Divergence
Overall
38
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Resource Divergence

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 24.2% 38 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2021 38.4% 38 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2020 2.5% 55 Fragile Recovery
2019 47 Fragile Recovery
2018 41 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2017 37 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2016 37 Financially Distressed Recovery
2015 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
STEPHEN ROSE MKT CONSULT 8.1% of Rev
ELAINE WALTERS Treasurer 6.3% of Rev
DEB MCCLELLAN MUSIC LIBRARY 2.9% of Rev
MARY KANTOR Board President 2.9% of Rev
NEIL BACON BOARD 1.4% of Rev
MARTHA GARRETT Board President 1.2% of Rev
CAROLYN WYMAN Secretary 1.0% of Rev
MERLE HARRIS RETIRED TREA 0.3% of Rev

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BROOK ROSE Board Member 41.0% of Rev
MARY KANTOR Board President 2.9% of Rev
CAROLYN WYMAN Secretary 1.3% of Rev
MERLE HARRIS Treasurer 1.1% of Rev
MARTHA GARRETT EXECUTIVE ASST 1.1% of Rev
BEVERLY SETZER Board President 0.4% of Rev

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BROOK ROSE Executive Director 15.2% of Rev
MERLE HARRIS Treasurer 0.3% of Rev
MARTHA GARRETT ASSISTANT ED 0.3% of Rev
MARY KANTOR Board President 0.2% of Rev
CAROLYN WYMAN Secretary 0.2% of Rev
BEV SETZER Board President 0.1% of Rev
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
38 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 235 other orgs in WA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 9 points above the peer median (50 vs. 41).

5-year trend: Acute Resource Divergence

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Reduce top-officer compensation from 24.2% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~5 points.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.