Insufficient Data
At least 3 years of filing history are required to project a trajectory.
Insufficient Data
Market
Archetype
Mechanical
Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint
Insufficient Data
What does this mean?
Not enough historical data to determine a longitudinal pattern.
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Insufficient Data ↑
Overall
52
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
45
Score
Title
-
Institutions
-
Avg Revenue
-
Risk Profile
Representative Institutions
Institutional Epochs
2020
2021
2022
2023
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Insufficient Data
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Hidden | Hidden | — | — | Unknown | — | |
| 2023 | Hidden | Hidden | — | — | Unknown | — | |
| 2022 | — | — | — | 52 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2021 | — | — | 0.5% | 36 | Financially Distressed | Stable Watch |
Officer compensation history
Tax year 2025
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GEORGE H WATERMAN | Treasurer | — | ||
| SUSAN P FIRESTONE | Board Member | — | ||
| JORIE M WATERMAN | Board Member | — | ||
| GWENDOLYN WEST | Board Member | — | ||
| SUSAN WATERMAN | Secretary | — | ||
| GEORGE H WATERMAN | Treasurer | — | ||
| SUSAN P FIRESTONE | Board Member | — | ||
| JORIE M WATERMAN | Board Member | — | ||
| GWENDOLYN WEST | Board Member | — | ||
| SUSAN WATERMAN | Secretary | — |
Tax year 2023
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Susan Waterman | Secretary | 0.2% of Rev | ||
| SUSAN P FIRESTONE | Board Member | — | ||
| JORIE M WATERMAN | Board Member | — | ||
| GWENDOLYN WEST | Board Member | — | ||
| GEORGE H WATERMAN | Treasurer | — | ||
| SUSAN WATERMAN | Secretary | — | ||
| George H Waterman 3 | Treasurer | — | ||
| Susan P Firestone | Board Member | — | ||
| Jorie M Waterman | Board Member | — | ||
| Gwendolyn West | Board Member | — |
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown
Score breakdown
Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
52 / 100
Stable
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Fewer than 3 peers found in CT for this NTEE subcategory; peer comparison would not be statistically meaningful.
5-year trend: Insufficient Data
Not enough historical data to determine a longitudinal pattern.
What's driving this score
- All-volunteer org with no paid officers — governance signal is neutral (default 50), not absent.
What would change this score
No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.