Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↑
Overall
47
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
55
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 — — — 47 Fragile Recovery
2022 — — — 42 Financially Distressed Recovery
2021 — — — 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2020 — — — 39 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
WADE SCHAAF Artistic Director —
DONNA L SPAGNOLA Treasurer —
GWYNETH EMIGH Secretary —
JIA LI Board Member —
AMANDA BREMBERG Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
WADE SCHAAF Artistic Director —
DONNA L SPAGNOLA Treasurer —
BECKY MIKOS Secretary —
GWYNETH EMIGH Board Member —
JOSEPH MARNEN Board Member —
AMANDA BREMBERG Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
55 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
47 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 376 other orgs in IL with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: governance score sits 17 points below the peer median (50 vs. 67).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.