Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Compensation Escalation Cycle

What does this mean?

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

The Path Forward

The Steward

Re-establishes board supremacy over executive extraction. It freezes compensation and mandates that all future financial rewards be tied strictly to verifiable mission expansion.

The Steward
The Steward
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle
Overall
41
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Compensation Escalation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2022 26.0% 42 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2021 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2020 8.2% 50 Fragile Recovery
2019 19.0% 39 Fragile Decline Risk
2018 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 52 Fragile Recovery
2016 47 Fragile Recovery
2015 52 Fragile Decline Risk
2012 51 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BJ INTINI Board President
LOIS REBOLI Board President
KATHY ROBERTS Secretary
CAROLYN SLAWSKI Treasurer

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LOIS REBOLI Board President
BJ INTINI Board President
COLLEEN HANSON Secretary
CAROLYN SLAWSKI Treasurer

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LOIS REBOLI Board President
BJ INTINI Board President
COLLEEN HANSON Secretary
CAROLYN SLAWSKI Treasurer
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
41 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Fewer than 3 peers found in NY for this NTEE subcategory; peer comparison would not be statistically meaningful.

5-year trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Reduce top-officer compensation from 26.6% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~9 points.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.