Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
47
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
65
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 47 Fragile Recovery
2022 44 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 48 Fragile Recovery
2020 36 Fragile Recovery
2019 23 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 37 Fragile Recovery
2015 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2014 19 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2013 19 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 27 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Janet Hunt Executive Director
Scott Diehl Board President
Abigail Peckenpaugh Secretary
Peter Renfro Treasurer
Janet Hunt Executive Director
Bonnie Tamblyn Board President
Rachel Lockhart Secretary
Peter Renfro Treasurer

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BONNIE M TAMBLYN Board President
RACHEL LOCKHART Vice President
PETE RENFRO Treasurer
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
65 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
47 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 830 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 32 points above the peer median (65 vs. 33).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 23 → 47 over 5 years (improving by 24 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.