Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Acute Resource Divergence

What does this mean?

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

The Path Forward

The Realignment

Forces immediate balancing of administrative bloat against actual programmatic output. It demands that every dollar extracted for overhead be justified by community impact.

The Realignment
The Realignment
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Acute Resource Divergence ↓
Overall
39
Score
Governance
58
Score
Financial
10
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Resource Divergence

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 — — 4.4% 39 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2022 — — 3.5% 39 Financially Distressed Recovery
2021 — — 1.5% 54 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — 17.0% 42 Fragile Decline Risk
2019 — — 2.9% 45 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2018 — — 3.7% 41 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2017 — — 3.2% 43 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2016 — — 3.6% 43 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2015 — — 3.2% 45 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2014 — — 3.0% 45 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2013 — — 2.9% 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 — — 1.2% 55 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Eric Frances Executive Director 1.8% of Rev
Paul Lloyd Overhead General Manager 0.7% of Rev
Paul Christman Treasurer 0.6% of Rev
Susan Russ Board Member 0.6% of Rev
Daniel Melchick Board Member 0.4% of Rev
Suzanne Morris Board Member 0.4% of Rev
Alan Gerry Board Member —
Keith Suehnholz Board Member —
Paul Guenther Secretary —
Adam Gerry Board Member —
Kathy Frommer Board Member —
Steve Marton Board Member —
Stuart Salenger Board Member —
Mike Watkins Board Member —
Frank Brown Board Member —
Glenn Friedman Board Member —
Judith Janney Board Member —
Rich Rowley Board Member —
Stacy Blustein Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Eric Frances Executive Director 1.6% of Rev
Paul Lloyd General Manager 0.7% of Rev
Paul Christman Treasurer 0.6% of Rev
Susan Russ Board Member 0.5% of Rev
Suzanne Morris Board Member 0.4% of Rev
Alan Gerry Board Member —
Kathy Frommer Board Member —
Jeffrey Gerson Board Member —
Ronald Greenberg Board Member —
Paul Guenther Secretary —
Steve Marton Board Member —
Stuart Salenger Board Member —
Keith Suehnholz Board Member —
Mike Watkins Board Member —
Frank Brown Board Member —
Glenn Friedman Board Member —
Judith Janney Board Member —
Rich Rowley Board Member —
Adam Gerry Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Eric Frances Executive Director 1.4% of Rev
Darlene Fedun Executive Director 1.3% of Rev
Hugo Tapia Treasurer 0.5% of Rev
Allison Oldehoff Dir. Of Individual Giving 0.5% of Rev
Frank Segro Board Member 0.5% of Rev
Alan Gerry Board Member —
Kathy Frommer Board Member —
Jeffrey Gerson Board Member —
Ronald Greenberg Board Member —
Paul Guenther Treasurer —
Steve Marton Board Member —
Stuart Salenger Board Member —
Keith Suehnholz Board Member —
Mike Watkins Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
10 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
58 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
39 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 806 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 61 points below the peer median (10 vs. 71).

5-year trend: Acute Resource Divergence

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.