Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

"Provides a comprehensive choral experience for both adults and youth, fostering musical skill development and community engagement across a wide age range and diverse repertoire."

— Statement of Program Service Accomplishments

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship

Demonstrated Impact

  • 85 singers in adult chorale
  • Three age-specific vocal ensembles for young singers
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
46
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
55
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 46 Fragile Recovery
2023 Hidden Hidden 47 Fragile Recovery
2021 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 45 Fragile Decline Risk
2019 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 49 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JANINE LIN Board President
ANDREW LATIMER Secretary
LISA STAFFORD Treasurer
CHRIS MOTLEY Treasurer
CHERYL LOEHR Board Member
KATIE JORDAN Board Member
EMILY BERGMANN Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
55 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
46 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 829 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 22 points above the peer median (55 vs. 33).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.