Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit ↓
Overall
26
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden 15.4% 26 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 — — 25.9% 26 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2021 — — 42.2% 21 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2020 — — 66.3% 23 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2019 — — 17.2% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 — — 6.8% 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2017 — — 7.1% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2016 — — 12.1% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 — — — 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 — — — 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 — — — 47 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KATHERINE POWERS Executive Director 9.4% of Rev
JOSH SHAW Executive Director 9.2% of Rev
BRUCE MERRITT Board President —
ROB WEBB Board President —
JESSICA MAMEY Secretary —
ERIC HAYNE TREASUERER —
BETTYNA BLUWAL Board Member —
JENNIFER DIENER Board Member —
RICK ELLINGSEN Board Member —
MING LIU Board Member —
PHILIP MEYER Board Member —
MATTHEW MILES Board Member —
JENNIFER MILLER HAMMEL Board Member —
FELIX RACELIS Board Member —
DORIS SHIMABUKURO Board Member —

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JOSH SHAW Executive Director 8.6% of Rev
KATHERINE POWERS Executive Director 6.8% of Rev
RICK ELLINGSEN Board President —
BRUCE MERRITT Board President —
ERIC HAYNE Treasurer —
ROBERT BAILEY Secretary —
BETTYNA BLUWAL Board Member —
JENNIFER DIENER Board Member —
ALDEN LAWRENCE Board Member —
MING LIU Board Member —
JESSICA MAMEY Board Member —
DORAINE MEYER Board Member —
PHILIP MEYER Board Member —
MATTHEW MILES Board Member —
JENNIFER MILLER HAMMEL Board Member —
FELIX RACELIS Board Member —
DORIS SHIMABUKURO Board Member —
ROB WEBB Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JOSH SHAW Executive Director 6.7% of Rev
MATTHEW COOK Executive Director 6.5% of Rev
RICK ELLINGSEN Board President —
WILLIAM T KENNEDY Board President —
ERIC HAYNE Treasurer —
ROBERT BAILEY Secretary —
PHIL MEYER Board Member —
BETTYNA BLUWAL Board Member —
BRUCE MERRITT Board Member —
MATTHEW MILES Board Member —
NAOKO SUGA Board Member —
ROB WEBB Board Member —
JENNIFER DEINER Board Member —
JENNIFER MILLER Board Member —
DORAINE MEYER Board Member —
ALDEN LAWRENCE Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MATTHEW COOK Executive Director 5.9% of Rev
JOSH SHAW Executive Director 4.6% of Rev
RICK ELLINGSEN Board President —
WILLIAM T KENNEDY Board President —
ERIC HAYNE Treasurer —
ROBERT BAILEY SECRETERY —
PHIL MEYER Board Member —
BETTYNA BLUWAL Board Member —
KATHY CRANDALL Board Member —
BRUCE MERRITT Board Member —
MATTHEW MILES Board Member —
NAOKO SUGA Board Member —
ROB WEBB Board Member —
MAMI ROTTER Board Member —
JENNIFER DEINER Board Member —
JENNIFER MILLER Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
26 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 1,424 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 53 points below the peer median (0 vs. 53).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.