Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
47
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
70
Score
Program
5
Score

Institutional Epochs

2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2020 47 Fragile Recovery
2019 44 Fragile Recovery
2018 37 Fragile Decline Risk
2017 57 Fragile Recovery
2016 47 Fragile Recovery
2015 45 Fragile Recovery
2014 43 Financially Distressed Recovery
2013 37 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
STACY MOONEY Treasurer
ALISSA AUNE MUSICDIRECT
JONEAL HANSEN Secretary
ANDRA D'AMICO Board President
MELISA BIXLER VICE PRESIDE
BROOKE PADILLA Treasurer
JENNIFER CASSEL Vice President
LISA FISHER Vice President
GABRIEL SAKUMA MUSIC DIRECT
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
70 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
5 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
47 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 830 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 37 points above the peer median (70 vs. 33).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 47 → 47 over 5 years (stable by 0 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.