Programmatic Contraction
Programmatic Contraction
Programmatic Contraction Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Programmatic Contraction

What does this mean?

Total revenue is stable, but the percentage of expenses spent on actual mission shrinks. Indicates administrative bloat and spending on the machinery of raising money rather than the art itself.

The Path Forward

The Rainmaker

Represents the forced release of hoarded resources back into the community. It acts as a pressure valve against administrative capture, ensuring the mission takes priority over the machine.

The Rainmaker
The Rainmaker
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Programmatic Contraction
Overall
31
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
20
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Programmatic Contraction

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2022 15.3% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 18.1% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2020 21.1% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 37 Financially Distressed Recovery
2018 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Barbara Nan Lambrecht Executive Director 15.3% of Rev
Gail Tyson Board President
CW Cherry Treasurer
Carolyn Corley Secretary
Jeff Kovac Board Member
Linda Parsons Board Member
Summer Awad Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Jayne Morgan Artistic Director 33.7% of Rev
Jeffrey Kovac Board President
Carolyn Corley Secretary
David Dwyer Board President
CW Bill Cherry Treasurer
Linda Parsons Board Member
Troy Scruggs Board Member
Summer Awad Board Member
Brandi Augustus Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Jayne Morgan Artistic Director 33.7% of Rev
Christopher freeman General Manager 18.3% of Rev
Jeffrey Kovac Board President
David Dwyer Board President
Troy Suggs Treasurer
Caroly Corley Secretry
Brandi Augustua Unspecified Role
Summer Awad Unspecified Role
Emily Black Unspecified Role
CW Cherry Unspecified Role
Glorietta Klarich Unspecified Role
Linda Parsons Unspecified Role
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
20 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
31 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 46 other orgs in TN with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 17 points below the peer median (20 vs. 37).

5-year trend: Programmatic Contraction

Total revenue is stable, but the percentage of expenses spent on actual mission shrinks. Indicates administrative bloat and spending on the machinery of raising money rather than the art itself.

Overall score has gone from 33 → 31 over 5 years (declining by 2 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.