Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Compensation Escalation Cycle

What does this mean?

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

The Path Forward

The Steward

Re-establishes board supremacy over executive extraction. It freezes compensation and mandates that all future financial rewards be tied strictly to verifiable mission expansion.

The Steward
The Steward
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle
Overall
39
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Compensation Escalation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 33.8% 39 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2022 15.2% 45 Fragile Gov Risk
2021 19.9% 45 Fragile Gov Risk
2020 20.7% 46 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2019 17.3% 46 Fragile Recovery
2018 43 Fragile Gov Risk
2017 47 Fragile Gov Risk
2016 43 Fragile Gov Risk
2015 7.8% 49 Fragile Recovery
2014 8.4% 45 Fragile Recovery
2013 13.6% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2012 8.4% 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2011 5.3% 51 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ELLEN FENNER Executive Director 33.8% of Rev
PAT SCHWAN Board President
CRAIG ERAAS Board President
SUSAN PODYGULA Board Member
MICHAEL HEIL Treasurer
JOY-NICOLE SMITH Board Member
MICHELLE BASSLER Board Member
ANN CADWALADER Board Member
PAULETTE DAILEY Board Member
JESSICA EGGE Board Member
DIANE LAUTT Board Member
JOHN JERMIASON Board Member
PAM JUNDT Board Member
KELI ROSELLI-SULLIVAN Board Member
LAURIE VERBITSKY Board Member
TONIA VITKO Board Member
DUSTY ZIMMERMAN Secretary

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ELLEN FENNER Executive Director 30.0% of Rev
CHRISTINE BAUMANN Board President
SHERI LIEN Board Member
MICHAEL HEIL Treasurer
SUSAN PODRYGULA Secretary
PAULETTE DAILEY Board Member
SHANNA LUCY Board Member
JOHN JERMIASON Board Member
PAT SCHWAN Board President
DUSTY ZIMMERMAN Board Member
LAURIE VERBITSKY Board Member
PAM ONDRACEK Board Member
MICHELLE BASSLER Board Member
V LEROY CHAUSSE Board Member
ABBY WALKER GASKILL Board Member
CRAIG ERAAS Board Member
EVAN LOOSEN Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ELLEN FENNER Executive Director 23.5% of Rev
CHRISTINE BAUMANN Board President
SHERI LIEN Board Member
MICHAEL HEIL Treasurer
SUSAN PODRYGULA Secretary
PAULETTE DAILEY Board Member
SHANNA LUCY Board Member
JOHN JERMIASON Board Member
PAT SCHWAN Board President
DUSTY ZIMMERMAN Board Member
LAURIE VERBITSKY Board Member
PAM ONDRACEK Board Member
MICHELLE BASSLER Board Member
V LEROY CHAUSSE Board Member
ABBY WALKER GASKILL Board Member
CRAIG ERAAS Board Member
EVAN LOOSEN Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ELLEN FENNER Executive Director 20.3% of Rev
CHRISTINE BAUMANN Board President
SHERI LIEN Board Member
MICHAEL HEIL Treasurer
SUSAN PODRYGULA Secretary
PAULETTE DAILEY Board Member
SHANNA LUCY Board Member
JOHN JERMIASON Board Member
JOHN WARNER Board President
JERI LANGEMO Board Member
BONNY KEMPER Board Member
LAURIE VERBITSKY Board Member
RANDAL MITSCHKE Board Member
MICHELLE BASSLER Board Member
V LEROY CHAUSSE Board Member
ABBY WALKER GASKILL Board Member
NICK WELLS Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
39 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 19 other orgs in ND with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 11 points above the peer median (50 vs. 39).

5-year trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 33.8% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~24 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.