Insufficient Data
At least 3 years of filing history are required to project a trajectory.
Insufficient Data Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Insufficient Data

What does this mean?

Not enough historical data to determine a longitudinal pattern.

Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Insufficient Data ↓
Overall
53
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
60
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Insufficient Data

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden — 53 Fragile Recovery
2022 — — — 55 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SALLY BAIRD Board Member —
HOWARD CAVNER Board Member —
MATTHEW EDWARDS SECRETARTY —
LEASTER GIBSON Board Member —
SHAE JOHNSON Board Member —
SARAH KERNER Board Member —
ALIA LEE Board Member —
JOHN MCQUEARY Board Member —
BRYAN MUSGRAVE Board Member —
JASON RADER Board President —
BRIAN RIEDY Treasurer —
JESSE TYLER Board Member —
CHRIS WEISS Board Member —
SONYA WISE Board President —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SALLY BAIRD Board Member —
HOWARD CAVNER Board President —
MATTHEW EDWARDS SECRETARTY —
LEASTER GIBSON Board President —
SHAE JOHNSON Board Member —
SARAH KERNER Board Member —
JOHN MCQUEARY Board Member —
ALEX PRIMM Board Member —
JASON RADER Board Member —
BRIAN RIEDY Treasurer —
JESSE TYLER Board Member —
CHRIS WEISS Board Member —
SONYA WISE Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
60 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
53 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 161 other orgs in MO with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 15 points above the peer median (45 vs. 30).

5-year trend: Insufficient Data

Not enough historical data to determine a longitudinal pattern.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.