Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit ↑
Overall
36
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
25
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 — — 38.3% 36 Fragile Gov Risk
2022 — — 14.9% 39 Fragile Recovery
2021 — — 19.9% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2020 — — 17.4% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2019 — — 8.3% 36 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2018 — — 18.5% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 — — 21.2% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2016 — — 23.5% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2015 — — 12.1% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2014 — — 24.7% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 — — 20.1% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 — — 21.2% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2011 — — 22.7% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Rachel Tibbetts Artistic Director 18.8% of Rev
John Wolbers Executive Director 18.8% of Rev
Lisa Durkin Board President —
Cassidy Flynn Board President —
Andrea Lubershane Treasurer —
Jocelyn Matsuo Secretary —
Courtney Everett Board Member —
Mark Holly Board Member —
Steven Knight Board Member —
Matthew Mahaffey Board Member —
Karen Meyer Board Member —
Tim Mooney Board Member —
Kevin Windhauser PhD Board Member —
Phil Woodmore PhD Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
John Wolbers Executive Director 13.5% of Rev
Steven Knight Board President —
Jocelyn Matsuo Board President —
Paige Colon Secretary —
Matthew Mahaffey Treasurer —
Edgar Evans Board Member —
Jami Dolby Board Member —
Evan Kuhn Board Member —
Tara A Nealey PhD Board Member —
Phil Woodmore PhD Board Member —
Lisa Cohn Durkin Board Member —
Mark Holly Board Member —
Tim Mooney Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Shannon Durio Executive Director 15.9% of Rev
Steven Knight Board President —
April Foster Board President —
Melinda Ligon Secretary —
Jami Dolby Board Member —
Edgar Evans Board Member —
Chris Harris Board Member —
Evan Kuhn Board Member —
George Lombardi Board Member —
Matthew Mahaffey Board Member —
Jocelyn Matsuo Board Member —
Tara A Nealey PhD Board Member —
Gina T Savoie Esq Board Member —
Phil Woodmore PhD Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
25 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
36 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 161 other orgs in MO with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 28 points below the peer median (25 vs. 53).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 38.3% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~33 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.