Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

"Fosters meaningful engagement with innovative contemporary art for all ages in St. Louis, providing extensive free arts education and pre-professional training for youth, and actively partnering with community organizations to address social issues through art."

— Statement of Program Service Accomplishments

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship

Demonstrated Impact

  • 177 programs and tours
  • 99% were free (of programs/tours)
  • served 4,352 youth from the greater St. Louis area
  • New Art in the Neighborhood (at 28 years, CAM's longest running education program)
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↑
Overall
48
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 — — 11.0% 48 Fragile Decline Risk
2023 Hidden Hidden 2.0% 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2022 — — 6.4% 54 Fragile Recovery
2021 — — 8.7% 50 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 — — 9.2% 50 Fragile Decline Risk
2019 — — 5.0% 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 — — 4.5% 55 Fragile Recovery
2017 — — 6.8% 50 Fragile Decline Risk
2016 — — 1.9% 55 Fragile Recovery
2015 — — 8.1% 50 Fragile Decline Risk
2014 — — 5.6% 54 Fragile Recovery
2013 — — 6.8% 48 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2012 — — 9.8% 50 Fragile Recovery
2011 — — 16.3% 47 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LISA MELANDRI Executive Director 6.3% of Rev
BRADLEY BAILEY Board Member —
HEDY LEE Board Member —
SUSAN BARRETT Board Member —
JOHN FERRING Board Member —
NANCY KRANZBERG Board Member —
JUDITH W LEVY Board Member —
SUSAN MCCOLLUM Board Member —
EMILY RAUH PULITZER Board Member —
JULIAN SCHUSTER Board Member —
REX SINQUEFIELD Board Member —
AMY SOPER Board Member —
MICHAEL STAENBERG Board Member —
DONALD SUGGS Board Member —
KATE WARNE Board Member —
PAT WHITAKER Board Member —
JANE CLARK Board Member —
TERRY HOFFMANN Board Member —
ANDREW SRENCO Board Member —
RICK SHANG Board Member —
JIAMIN DIERBERG Board Member —
SHEREEN FISCHER Board Member —
GARY KROSCH Board Member —
JOE HERMAN Board Member —
BRADFORD WERNER Board Member —
MARGARET MCDONALD Board Member —
CORT VANOSTRAN Board Member —
JACOB W REBY Board Member —
PAUL CAMBRIDGE Secretary —
JACKIE YOON Treasurer —
ALEXIS COSSE Board President —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
48 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 14 other orgs in MO with NTEE prefix A9.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 55 points above the peer median (60 vs. 5).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 50 → 48 over 5 years (declining by 2 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.