Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
55
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
90
Score
Program
5
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2022 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2021 58 Fragile Recovery
2020 52 Fragile Recovery
2019 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2018 49 Fragile Decline Risk
2017 51 Fragile Recovery
2016 47 Fragile Recovery
2015 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 45 Fragile Recovery
2012 41 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 41 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CHRIS MUELLER Board President
CLIFFORD BRANCH Treasurer
GALE NISWONGER Board Member
CLAUDIA FROST Board President
JAKE WYATT Treasurer
HOLLY CABEL Secretary
GALE NISWONGER Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
90 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
5 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
55 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 105 other orgs in MO with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 52 points above the peer median (90 vs. 38).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 49 → 55 over 5 years (improving by 6 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.