Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
30
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
5
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 30 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2022 23 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2020 26 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2019 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2018 27 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2017 27 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2016 7.3% 25 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2015 11.9% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2014 23 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Mark Gilbert Board Member
Cheryl Brewer Board Member
Joan Beard Board Member
Christopher Cottle Board Member
Kimberly Dent Board Member
Darrell J Jordan Board Member
Janaire Seye Board President
Kimberly Pierce Secretary
Samantha Sanchez Board President
Kimberly Reardon Treasurer

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Janaire Seye Board Member
Cheryl Brewer Board Member
Joan Beard Board Member
Samantha Sanchez Board Member
Pat Timberlake Board Member
Hattie Francis Board Member
Melissa Menard Board Member
Charlie Ochoa Board Member
Kristi Story Treasurer
Karin Bursch Board President
Lisa Dobbs Board President
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
5 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
30 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 27 other orgs in MO with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 23 points below the peer median (5 vs. 28).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.