Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit ↑
Overall
31
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
15
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 — — 20.1% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2022 — — 15.4% 40 Fragile Recovery
2021 — — 27.9% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2020 — — 15.3% 25 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 — — 15.2% 25 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 — — 13.0% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2017 — — 12.6% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2016 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2015 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2014 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2013 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2012 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ELIZABETH SHARP EXECUTIVE DRECTOR 14.7% of Rev
MARTIAL THEVENOT Board President —
PATRICK DARE Board President —
KARL WELLENKOETTER Secretary —
ANGELA WILLIAMS-CRANE Treasurer —
DREW BROWN Board Member —
KATHIE BRUNNER Board Member —
JOANN COBB Board Member —
SID JOHNSON Board Member —
TOBY LAWRENCE Board Member —
NATHANAEL MAY Board Member —
KELLY MORRIS Board Member —
NANCY NASH Board Member —
MARGE REDMOND Board Member —
PAM SMITH Board Member —
CHARLOTTE SOLLARS Board Member —
SPONGE THEVENOT Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ELIZABETH SHARP EXECUTIVE DRECTOR 15.3% of Rev
CARLA HASSLER Board Member —
NANCY KIRBY Board Member —
MARGE LISTER Board Member —
NATHANIEL MAY Board Member —
PAM SMITH Board Member —
CHARLOTTE SOLLARS Board Member —
MARY JO HARRIS Board Member —
KAREN VANSICKLE-LAKE Board Member —
ANGELA WILLIAMS-CRANE Board Member —
LAURA WYETH Board Member —
MARY SHUMAN Board President —
MARTIAL THEVENOT Board President —
KARL WELLENKOETTER Secretary —
NANCY NASH Treasurer —
DREW BROWN Board Member —
PAT CATHEY Board Member —
ANDREW CLARK Board Member —
DEBBIE DEMUTH Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ELIZABETH SHARP EXECUTIVE DRECTOR 13.9% of Rev
MARY SHUMAN Board President —
MARY JO HARRIS Board President —
KARL WELLENKOETTER Secretary —
NANCY NASH Treasurer —
DREW BROWN Board Member —
PAT CATHEY Board Member —
ANDREW CLARK Board Member —
DEBBIE DEMUTH Board Member —
CARLA HASSLER Board Member —
NANCY KIRBY Board Member —
MARGE LISTER Board Member —
NATHANIEL MAY Board Member —
PAM SMITH Board Member —
CHARLOTTE SOLLARS Board Member —
MARTIAL THEVENOT Board Member —
KAREN VANSICKLE-LAKE Board Member —
ANGELA WILLIAMS-CRANE Board Member —
LAURA WYETH Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
15 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
31 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 160 other orgs in MO with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 38 points below the peer median (15 vs. 53).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

Overall score has gone from 25 → 31 over 5 years (improving by 6 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.