Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
38
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
25
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 38 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2022 41 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2021 Hidden Hidden 38 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2020 Hidden Hidden 41 Fragile Stable Watch
2019 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2018 49 Fragile Recovery
2017 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2016 0.6% 52 Fragile Recovery
2012 13.9% 49 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ANDREW GERODIAS Board President
TRICIA ALBRIGHT Board President
CRAIG BARNES Treasurer
ANGELA IVERSON Secretary
COLT WITT Board Member
DAVE DZIURAWIES Board Member
DAVID SUHR Board Member
KARA MINNIHAN Board Member

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
RICKY MYERS Board President
DAVID DZIURAWIEC Board President
COLT WITT Treasurer
ANGELA IVERSON Secretary
KELL ERICKSON Board Member
KARA LEE Board Member
CRAIG BARNES Board Member
TRICIA ALBRIGHT Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
RICKY MYERS Board President
ANTHONY DELFS Treasurer
BENJAMIN MAURITZ Board President
PAM MCDERMOTT Secretary
WAYNE BLUM Board Member
KRISTI QUINN Board Member
GREG GILES Board Member
AMY KIMBELL Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
25 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
38 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 85 other orgs in IA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 14 points below the peer median (25 vs. 39).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.