Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Acute Resource Divergence

What does this mean?

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

The Path Forward

The Realignment

Forces immediate balancing of administrative bloat against actual programmatic output. It demands that every dollar extracted for overhead be justified by community impact.

The Realignment
The Realignment
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Acute Resource Divergence ↓
Overall
31
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Resource Divergence

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 — — 15.2% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 — — — 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 — — 6.7% 50 Fragile Stable Watch
2020 — — 5.3% 50 Fragile Recovery
2019 — — 10.9% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 — — — 48 Fragile Recovery
2017 — — — 44 Fragile Recovery
2016 — — 7.0% 42 Financially Distressed Recovery
2015 — — — 46 Fragile Recovery
2014 — — 6.9% 46 Fragile Decline Risk
2013 — — 4.2% 49 Fragile Recovery
2012 — — 13.3% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
RAMON TEBAR Artistic Director 16.9% of Rev
MELANIE KALNINS EXEUCTIVE DI 3.4% of Rev
BRONWEN ADAMS CO-CHAIRMAN —
DR KRZYSZTOF BIERNACKI Board Member —
JANICE BURRUS Board Member —
MOIRA FENNESSEY Board Member —
LIVIO FERRARI Board Member —
SALLY GLEASON Board Member —
GERALD GOLDBERG Board Member —
ELIZABETH HARRINGTON Board Member —
ERIC KALNINS Board Member —
JAN KANTOR Board Member —
LINDA KEHOE Secretary —
SUSAN MULLIN Board Member —
KATHLEEN FIELD ORR Board Member —
LARRY OST CHAIRMAN OF —
JOHN PEPE Treasurer —
MELODY SAWYER-RICHARDSON Board President —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SONDRA QUINN Executive Director 7.9% of Rev
WENDY NEEDHAM Treasurer —
LARRY OST CHAIRMAN —
JOHN PEPE Board Member —
LINDA KEHOE Secretary —
DR KRZYSZTOF BIERNACKI Board Member —
MOIRA FENNESSEY Board Member —
LIVIO FERRARI Board Member —
SALLY GLEASON Board Member —
JERRY GOLDBERG Board Member —
PATRICK MORAN Board Member —
BRIAN DORN Board Member —
CARL SCEUSA Board Member —
SUSAN MULLIN SCOTT Board Member —
BRONWEN ADAMS Board Member —
JAN BURRUS Board Member —
BRENO DONATTI Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SONDRA QUINN Executive Director 8.3% of Rev
WENDY NEEDHAM BOARD CHAIRWOMAN —
JOHN PEPE Treasurer —
LINDA KEHOE Secretary —
JAN BURRUS Board Member —
DR KRZYSZTOF BIERNACKI Board Member —
MOIRA FENNESSEY Board Member —
LIVIO FERRARI Board Member —
SALLY GLEASON Board Member —
JERRY GOLDBERG Board Member —
PATRICK MORAN Board Member —
BRIAN DORN Board Member —
LARRY OST Board Member —
SUSAN MULLIN SCOTT Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
TIMOTHY SIMMONS Executive Director 12.0% of Rev
WENDY NEEDHAM Board President —
JOHN PEPE Treasurer —
LINDA KEHOE Secretary —
JAN BURRUS Board Member —
BILL EDGERTON Board Member —
MOIRA FENNESSEY Board Member —
LIVIO FERRARI Board Member —
SALLY GLEASON Board Member —
JERRY GOLDBERG Board Member —
PATRICK MORAN Board Member —
CHARLEY NEVARIL Board Member —
LARRY OST Board Member —
SUSAN MULLIN SCOTT Board Member —
DAVE SLOBODIEN Board Member —
SHARON TREISER Board Member —
KARL WYSS Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
31 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 477 other orgs in FL with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 54 points below the peer median (0 vs. 54).

5-year trend: Acute Resource Divergence

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.