Acute Stabilization
Acute Stabilization
Acute Stabilization Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Acute Stabilization

What does this mean?

A successful crisis intervention. After hitting the Priority Review risk tier, the organization demonstrates consecutive years of Financial Score recovery paired with Governance Score improvement.

The Path Forward

The Dawn

Institutionalizes the emergency protocols that saved the organization. It locks in new, rigorous governance policies to prevent a relapse into crisis.

The Dawn
The Dawn
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Acute Stabilization
Overall
35
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
15
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Acute Stabilization

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 35 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 18.9% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 25.1% 22 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2020 16.1% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 20.3% 23 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 19.2% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 34.6% 17 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 43.5% 19 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2015 69.1% 17 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2014 55.7% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2013 42 Fragile Recovery
2012 21.1% 39 Fragile Gov Risk
2011 52 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KATHRYN CHASE BRYER Board Member
ELIZABETH DINKOVA Board Member
GILLIAN DRAKE Board Member
ADAM HUNTER Board Member
FLOYD L NORTON IV BOARDCHAIR/T
KATHERINE LANGE Secretary
LAURA K RHODES Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
RICHARD HENRICH Board President 18.4% of Rev
RICHARD HENRICH Board President 13.6% of Rev
GILIAN DRAKE Board Member
MOHAMMAD HAFEZI Board Member
FLOYD L NORTON IV Board President
ADNAN KHANDKER Treasurer
KATHERINE LANGE Secretary
PATRICK LITTLEFIELD Treasurer
KIM SAMMIS Board Member
WENDY K WILMER Board President
GILLIAN DRAKE Board Member
FLOYD L NORTON IV Board President
KATHERINE LANGE Secretary
WENDY K WILMER Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
RICHARD HENRICH Board President 10.6% of Rev
GILIAN DRAKE Board Member
FLOYD L NORTON IV Secretary
ADNAN KHANDKER Treasurer
KATHERINE LANGE Board Member
KIM SAMMIS Board Member
WENDY K WILMER Board President
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
15 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
35 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 55 other orgs in DC with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 10 points below the peer median (15 vs. 25).

5-year trend: Acute Stabilization

A successful crisis intervention. After hitting the Priority Review risk tier, the organization demonstrates consecutive years of Financial Score recovery paired with Governance Score improvement.

Overall score has gone from 23 → 35 over 5 years (improving by 12 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).
  2. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.