Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
23
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
5
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 23 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2023 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 44 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 50 Fragile Stable Watch
2019 50 Fragile Recovery
2018 41 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2016 47 Fragile Recovery
2015 41 Fragile Recovery
2014 37 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 37 Fragile Decline Risk
2012 43 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DANIEL FINLEY Board President
JOEL WESTRA Treasurer
KENDRA THOMPSON Secretary

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
RHONDA PENNINGS VICE PRESIDE
TJ SPEER Treasurer
HERM VAN DEN HUL Board Member
DANIEL FINLEY Board President
LYLE VAN RAVENSWAAY GENERAL MANA
NANCY SPEER Board Member
JOHN MACINNIS Secretary
AUDRA OLSON Board Member
LISA MIEDEMA Board Member
KRISTOPHER FALKENA Board Member
KENDRA THOMPSON EXECUTIVE AS

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
RHONDA PENNINGS VICE PRESIDE
TJ SPEER Treasurer
HERM VAN DEN HUL Board Member
DANIEL FINLEY Board President
LYLE VAN RAVENSWAAY GENERAL MANA
NANCY SPEER Board Member
JOHN MACINNIS Secretary
AUDRA OLSON Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
5 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
23 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 85 other orgs in IA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 34 points below the peer median (5 vs. 39).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 50 → 23 over 5 years (declining by 27 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.