Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
46
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
55
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden 46 Fragile Recovery
2023 37 Financially Distressed Recovery
2022 40 Fragile Recovery
2021 45 Fragile Recovery
2020 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2019 43 Fragile Recovery
2018 37 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2017 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2016 47 Fragile Recovery
2015 37 Fragile Decline Risk
2014 41 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 41 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Alexia Slauson Board President
Michele Mehlberger-Horsfall Board President
TJ Shubert Secretary
Tony Burton Treasurer

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Bill Watts Board President
Greg Barnett Board President
Kim Flugga-Ciha Secretary
Terri Hungerford Treasurer
Tony Burton Treasurer

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Steven Nurre Board President
William Watts Board President
Kim Flugga Ciha Secretary
Kathryn Hersey Treasurer
Patti Jakoubek Treasurer
Laura Behrens Marketing Coordinator
Karen Curry Fundraising/Gala
Linda Lehman General Hospitality
Bob Stewart Board Member
Bill Kilbourn Board Member
Sheila Wagner Board President
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
55 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
46 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 85 other orgs in IA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 16 points above the peer median (55 vs. 39).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.