Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↓
Overall
48
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden — 48 Fragile Recovery
2023 — — — 45 Fragile Recovery
2022 — — — 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2021 — — — 59 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — 9.8% 50 Fragile Recovery
2019 — — 7.7% 46 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 — — 7.5% 46 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 — — 7.8% 46 Fragile Recovery
2016 — — 8.1% 44 Fragile Recovery
2015 — — 8.4% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2014 — — 9.2% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 — — 8.4% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 — — 7.8% 46 Fragile Recovery
2011 — — 7.0% 38 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ANTHONY CRAVERO Treasurer —
MATT WALKER Board President —
TREVOR LOES Board President —
JACKIE HAWKINS-KECK Board President —
LUKE MILLER Board President —
MATTHEW DREES Board President —
MYLES FINN Board President —
SAM SCHROEDER Board President —
NICK OSWALD Board President —
MARENA HENKLE Board President —
ANDREW STONEKING Board President —
LISA OTT Board President —
RACHAEL WRAGGE Board President —
LUKE LOVEGOOD Board President —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ANTHONY CRAVERO Board President —
MATT WALKER Board President —
TREVOR LOES Board President —
JACKIE HAWKINS Board President —
LUKE MILLER Board President —
TANNER STUTZMAN Board President —
MYLES FINN Board President —
JULIA MULLIN Board President —
MARENA HENKLE Board President —
ANDREW STONEKING Board President —
JENNIFER MCCLENAHAN Board President —
LUKE LOVEGOOD Board President —
NORM GRIMM Treasurer —
NICK OSWALD Board President —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JENNIFER MCCLENAHAN Board President —
LUKE LOVEGOOD Board President —
MARK BABCOCK Board President —
NORM GRIMM Treasurer —
TOM GERKING Board President —
JODI FRIEST Board President —
KRISTA WALTER Board President —
SARAH BIEBER Board President —
ANTHONY CRAVERO Board President —
JULIE THOMAS Board President —
TEALE BURFORD Board President —
MELISSA SHALLBERG Board President —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JOLEEN WOODS Treasurer 7.2% of Rev
JODY FRIEST REPRESENTATIVE —
LAUREN FLADLAND REPRESENTATIVE —
JILL WILSON Board President —
JENNIFER MCCLENAHAN Board President —
JEREMY MANTERNACH SOUND BRD EDIT —
COLLETTE MCCLELLEN REPRESENTATIVE —
KRISTA WALTER REPRESENTATIVE —
JOE STRONG REPRESENTATIVE —
SARAH BIEBER REPRESENTATIVE —
TOM GERKING REPRESENTATIVE —
ERIC MOHLIS REPRESENTATIVE —
MARK BABCOCK Board President —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
48 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 111 other orgs in IA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 16 points above the peer median (45 vs. 29).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.