Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

"Delivers amateur live theater to the Ankeny Community, engaging a large volunteer base and occasionally premiering new works, while fostering community participation."

— Statement of Program Service Accomplishments

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship

Demonstrated Impact

  • 2140 tickets sold
  • over 135 volunteers
  • 3600 volunteer hours
  • produced 1 World Premiere
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↑
Overall
60
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
90
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden — 60 Fragile Recovery
2022 — — — 51 Fragile Recovery
2021 — — — 48 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 — — — 56 Fragile Recovery
2019 — — — 46 Fragile Recovery
2018 — — — 37 Fragile Recovery
2017 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2016 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 — — — 39 Fragile Recovery
2014 — — — 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2013 — — — 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2012 — — — 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2011 — — — 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ABBY MARTIN Board Member —
JANET TUTTLE Secretary —
AMY MCGREW Board Member —
GREG ROMANS Board Member —
JULIA SPERA Board Member —
DAN CHASE Board Member —
ANNA SUNSTROM Board President —
ALI KIRWEN Board Member —
ABBY MARTIN Board Member —
JANET TUTTLE Secretary —
AMY MCGREW Board Member —
GREG ROMANS Board President —
JULIA SPERA Board Member —
DAN CHASE Board Member —
ANNA SUNSTROM Board President —
ALI KIRWEN Board President —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CHERYL CLARK CoPresident —
ALI KIRWEN CoPresident —
JOE KIRWEN Treasurer —
JANET TUTTLE Secretary —
STACIE BENDIXEN Board Member —
BRAD CHURCH Board Member —
LISA GOULD Board Member —
SCOTT HAMILTON Board Member —
DEVYN HENSON Board Member —
JIM LEEPER Board Member —
LAUREN MILLS Board Member —
ANNA SUNSTROM Board Member —
MAIA TALARICO Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CHERYL CLARK CoPresident —
ALI KIRWEN CoPresident —
JOE KIRWEN Treasurer —
JANET TUTTLE Secretary —
STACIE BENDIXEN Board Member —
BRAD CHURCH Board Member —
LISA GOULD Board Member —
SCOTT HAMILTON Board Member —
DEVYN HENSON Board Member —
JIM LEEPER Board Member —
LAUREN MILLS Board Member —
ANNA SUNSTROM Board Member —
MAIA TALARICO Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SUSAN CASBER Board President —
CHERYL CLARK Board President —
JOE KIRWEN Treasurer —
MATT TUTTLE Secretary —
JOHN CLASE Board Member —
JAMES MACHAMER Board President —
BRAD CHURCH Board Member —
TAMRA MULLEN Board Member —
ALLYSON MARTENS Board Member —
ROBERT UY Board Member —
TAMMY SPOSETO Board Member —
WHITNEY WELP Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
90 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
60 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 6 other orgs in IA with NTEE prefix A9.

Most-divergent component: governance score sits 29 points below the peer median (50 vs. 79).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.