Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↑
Overall
56
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
60
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden — 56 Fragile Recovery
2022 — — — 49 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 — — — 52 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 — — — 48 Fragile Decline Risk
2019 — — — 52 Fragile Decline Risk
2018 — — — 42 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2017 — — 44.8% 35 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2016 — — 41.0% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2015 — — 24.3% 36 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2014 — — 51.6% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2013 — — 60.8% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2012 — — 19.7% 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 — — 16.8% 47 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ROMA CALATAYUD-STOCKS Board President —
MARY SUMNERS Board President —
LINDA BARTLING Treasurer —
CONNIE SOMMERS Secretary —
MILA EKLUND Board President —
BRENT REICHERT Board Member —
SANDY REICHERT Board Member —
SUSAN MILTEER Board Member —
LAUREN FICHTEL-HEWITT Board Member —
MEG GISSLEN Board Member —
LISA ROEHL Board Member —
MARY ELLA PRATTE Board Member —
LESLIE DAVIS NIEMOELLER Board Member —
AARON BROWN Board Member —
ANN FARRELL Board Member —
ANNA LAMB Board Member —
PATRICIA RICE Board Member —
JESSICA ROSE Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BRENT REICHERT DIRECTORS OF DEVELOPMENT —
SANDY REICHERT DIRECTORS OF DEVELOPMENT —
CAROL BOSSMAN Board Member —
CINDY OLMANSON Board President —
DAVID DAVIS Board Member —
EMILY CLAUSMAN Board Member —
IRENE SUDDARD Treasurer —
JULIE CRAVEN Board Member —
KELSEY DODSON-SMITH Board Member —
KRISTIE NELSON-NEUHAUS Board Member —
LAUREN FICHTEL Board Member —
LINDA BARTLING Board Member —
LISA ROEHL Board Member —
LUDMILA EKLUND Board Member —
MELISSA OUSLEY Board Member —
MICHELLE WOOD Board Member —
SHERI TAMTE Board Member —
VICKI BRUNSVOLD Secretary —
VICKI BUNKER Board Member —
WADE HAUSER Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LUDMILA EKLUND Board Member —
VICKI BRUNSVOLD Secretary —
LISA ROEHL Board Member —
CAROL BOSSMAN Board Member —
CINDY OLMANSON Board President —
IRENE SUDDARD Treasurer —
SHERI TAMTE Board Member —
LAUREN FICHTEL Board Member —
NICK KOCK Board Member —
BECKY ODLAND Board Member —
VICKI BUNKER Board Member —
ANGELA MCKEAND Board Member —
MELISSA OUSLEY Board Member —
DEB DILLAWAY Board Member —
WADE HAUSER Board Member —
KATHY VIGIL Board Member —
MARY ELLA PRATTE Board President —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MARY ELLA PRATTE Board President —
LUDMILA EKLUND Board Member —
LINDA BARTLING Treasurer —
VICKI BRUNSVOLD Secretary —
PAMELA ARNSTEIN MUSICIAN LIASON —
KATHERINE ROEPKE Board Member —
LISA ROEHL Board Member —
JOANNA CORTRIGHT Board Member —
KATHERINE GALLIGAN Board Member —
BRIAN KIDWELL Board Member —
KATHY VIGIL Board Member —
KATY MIKETIC Board Member —
CAROL BOSSMAN Board Member —
NICH KOCH Board Member —
BECKY ODLAND Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
60 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
56 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 257 other orgs in MN with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 13 points above the peer median (45 vs. 32).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.