Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
54
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 9.2% 54 Fragile Recovery
2022 10.9% 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2021 6.2% 54 Fragile Recovery
2020 8.6% 52 Fragile Recovery
2019 11.6% 46 Fragile Decline Risk
2018 2.8% 53 Fragile Recovery
2017 14.1% 42 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2016 16.4% 40 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2015 10.3% 48 Fragile Decline Risk
2014 4.6% 47 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2013 9.1% 48 Fragile Gov Risk
2012 9.9% 50 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 3.8% 51 Fragile Decline Risk
2010 8.9% 54 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BETH ANN GERSTEIN Executive Director 9.9% of Rev
DAVID W ARMSTRONG FOUNDER
ALEX MUSE EHRLICH Board President
MARK WALSH Board President
KENT TOOL Treasurer
LISA SOISETH Secretary
DONALD PATTISON Board Member
PATSY COX Board Member
ROY DESELMS Board Member
BILL GEISINGER Board Member
KATHLEEN HOWE Board Member
GENE KILLIAN Board Member
SUZY SASAKI Board Member
NANCY SELVIN Board Member
DIANE SILBER Board Member
ROBIN TROZPEK Board Member
ANDY VOSKO Board Member
JOHN WIGMORE Board Member
RAULEE MARCUS Board Member
ROBIN BLAHUT Board Member
TRUDY CHIDDIX Board Member
PETER COYE Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BETH ANN GERSTEIN Executive Director 8.5% of Rev
DAVID W ARMSTRONG FOUNDER
ALEX MUSE EHRLICH Board President
MARK WALSH Board President
PETER COYE Treasurer
ROBERT DEA Secretary
LYNN BALLANTYNE Board Member
PATSY COX Board Member
ROY DESELMS Board Member
BILL GEISINGER Board Member
KATHLEEN HOWE Board Member
GENE KILLIAN Board Member
DONALD PATTISON Board Member
SUZY SASAKI Board Member
NANCY SELVIN Board Member
DIANE SILBER Board Member
LISA SOISETH Board Member
ROBIN TROZPEK Board Member
ANDY VOSKO Board Member
JEFFREY WARNOCK Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BETH ANN GERSTEIN Executive Director 7.2% of Rev
ROBIN TROZPEK Board Member
ANDY VOSKO Board Member
DAVID W ARMSTRONG FOUNDER
ALEX MUSE EHRLICH Board President
MARK WALSH Board President
PETER COYE Treasurer
ROBERT DEA Secretary
JEFFREY WARNOCK Board Member
NANCY SELVIN Board Member
LYNN BALLANTYNE Board Member
ROY DESELMS Board Member
SUZY SASAKI Board Member
DONALD PATTISON Board Member
PATSY COX Board Member
BILL GEISINGER Board Member
KATHLEEN HOWE Board Member
GENE KILLIAN Board Member
DIANE SILBER Board Member
LISA SOISETH Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BETH ANN GERSTEIN Executive Director 6.7% of Rev
DAVID W ARMSTRONG FOUNDER
DONALD PATTISON Board President
KENT TOOL Treasurer
JEFFREY WARNOCK Secretary
RAULEE MARCUS Board Member
SALVADOR PEREZ Board Member
JOHN TOKI Board Member
NANCY SELVIN Board Member
BRYAN VANSELL Board Member
LYNN BALLANTYNE Board Member
ROY DESELMS Board Member
GEORGE MCGOUGH Board Member
SUZY SASAKI Board Member
MARK WALSH Board Member
ROBERT DEA Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
54 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 43 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A5.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 17 points above the peer median (60 vs. 43).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.