Programmatic Contraction
Programmatic Contraction
Programmatic Contraction Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Programmatic Contraction

What does this mean?

Total revenue is stable, but the percentage of expenses spent on actual mission shrinks. Indicates administrative bloat and spending on the machinery of raising money rather than the art itself.

The Path Forward

The Rainmaker

Represents the forced release of hoarded resources back into the community. It acts as a pressure valve against administrative capture, ensuring the mission takes priority over the machine.

The Rainmaker
The Rainmaker
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Programmatic Contraction
Overall
37
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
30
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Programmatic Contraction

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 37 Financially Distressed Recovery
2022 32 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2021 20.7% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2020 22.3% 25 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 20.3% 25 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 21.8% 25 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2017 21.9% 24 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2016 19.3% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2015 18.4% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 41 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2013 41 Financially Distressed Recovery
2012 37 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2011 37 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2010 37 Financially Distressed Recovery
2008 25 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Annie Gibson Board Member
Kim Martinez Board President
Marcey Mastbaum Board President
Carol Cantrell Secretary
Gretchen Gasterland-Gustafsson Treasurer

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Kimberley Martinez Artistic Director 29.8% of Rev
Annie Gibson Board Member
Marcey Mastbaum Board President
Carol Cantrell Secretary
Nancy Evertz Treasurer
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
30 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
37 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 174 other orgs in MN with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 7 points below the peer median (30 vs. 37).

5-year trend: Programmatic Contraction

Total revenue is stable, but the percentage of expenses spent on actual mission shrinks. Indicates administrative bloat and spending on the machinery of raising money rather than the art itself.

Overall score has gone from 25 → 37 over 5 years (improving by 12 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).
  2. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.