Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Compensation Escalation Cycle

What does this mean?

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

The Path Forward

The Steward

Re-establishes board supremacy over executive extraction. It freezes compensation and mandates that all future financial rewards be tied strictly to verifiable mission expansion.

The Steward
The Steward
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle ↓
Overall
39
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
30
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Compensation Escalation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden 21.1% 39 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2022 — — 12.2% 45 Fragile Recovery
2021 — — 18.8% 47 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — 13.1% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 — — 9.5% 40 Fragile Recovery
2018 — — 11.1% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 — — 11.4% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 — — 10.8% 39 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 — — 10.8% 39 Fragile Recovery
2014 — — 13.6% 37 Fragile Recovery
2013 — — 13.5% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 — — 12.0% 37 Fragile Recovery
2011 — — 14.8% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Joel Sass Executive Dir. 22.7% of Rev
Stephen Noyes Board President —
John Buttolph Board President —
Daniel Pinkerton Secretary —
Steve Boland Treasurer —
Jean Morrison Board Member —
Marissa McDowell Board Member —
Virginia Sutton Board Member —
Katie Schmieg Miller Board Member —
Temma Shankman Board Member —
Rick Cousins Board Member —
Ellie Skelton Board Member —
Mollie O'Connor Board Member —

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Joel Sass Executive Dir. 21.1% of Rev
Libby Lincoln Board Member —
John Buttolph Board President —
Dan Pinkerton Secretary —
Stephen Noyes Board President —
Ellie Skelton Board Member —
Jean Morrison Board Member —
Virginia Sutton Board Member —
Steve Boland Treasurer —
Marissa McDowell Board Member —
Temma Shankman Board Member —
Richard Ericson Board Member —
Richard Cousins Board Member —
Katie Schmieg Miller Board Member —
Char Mason Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Joel Sass Executive Dir. 16.1% of Rev
Libby Lincoln Board President —
John Buttolph Board President —
Dan Pinkerton Secretary —
Susan Haas Board Member —
Michael Haney Board Member —
Jean Morrison Board Member —
Ginny Sutton Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Elizabeth Lincoln Board President —
John Buttolph Treasurer —
Dan Pinkerton Secretary —
Joel Sass Artistic Director —
Susan Haas Board Member —
Renee Harberts Board Member —
Michael Haney Board Member —
Jean Morrison Board Member —
Virginia Sutton Board Member —
Amy Warner Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Susan Haas Executive Dir. 7.8% of Rev
Michael Sommers Board Member 1.2% of Rev
Keith Lester Board President —
Dan Pinkerton Secretary —
Charlie Vanek Treasurer —
John Buttolph Board Member —
Craig Harris Board Member —
Elizabeth Lincoln Board Member —
Dr Susan Schaefer Board Member —
Ginny Sutton Board Member —
Amy Warner Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
30 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
39 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 256 other orgs in MN with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 21 points below the peer median (30 vs. 51).

5-year trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.