Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Compensation Escalation Cycle

What does this mean?

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

The Path Forward

The Steward

Re-establishes board supremacy over executive extraction. It freezes compensation and mandates that all future financial rewards be tied strictly to verifiable mission expansion.

The Steward
The Steward
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle ↑
Overall
47
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Compensation Escalation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 — — 19.0% 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 — — 12.2% 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2021 — — 6.3% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2020 — — 8.3% 54 Fragile Recovery
2019 — — 11.4% 48 Fragile Recovery
2018 — — 23.3% 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2017 — — 11.7% 52 Fragile Recovery
2016 — — 37.6% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2015 — — 24.6% 47 Fragile Recovery
2014 — — 31.1% 36 Fragile Gov Risk
2013 — — 31.0% 36 Fragile Recovery
2012 — — 44.8% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Dipankar Mukherjee Artistic Director 8.7% of Rev
Meena Natarajan Executive Dir. 8.4% of Rev
Sharon Day Board Member —
Soyini Guyton Board Member —
Raj V Rajan Board Member —
L Kelley Lindquist Board Member —
Ramona Advani Board Member —
Afshan Anjum Board Member —
Judi H Obeid Board Member —
Ramla Bile Board Member —
Mona Antilla Carloni Board President —
Olga Herrera Secretary —
Rajan Menon Board President —
Bert Wilson Treasurer —

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Meena Natarajan Executive Dir. 9.5% of Rev
Dipankar Mukherjee Artistic Director 9.4% of Rev
Sharon Day Board Member —
Soyini Guyton Board Member —
Raj V Rajan Board Member —
L Kelley Lindquist Board Member —
Ramona Advani Board Member —
Afshan Anjum Board Member —
Judi H Obeid Board Member —
Ramla Bile Board Member —
Mona Antilla Carloni Board President —
Olga Herrera Secretary —
Rajan Menon Board President —
Bert Wilson Treasurer —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DIPANKAR MUKHERJEE Artistic Director 6.8% of Rev
MEENA NATARAJAN EXECUTIVE DIR. 6.7% of Rev
AFSHAN ANJUM Board Member —
RAMONA ADVANI Board Member —
BERT WILSON Treasurer —
FREIDA MARTIN Board Member —
JUDI H OBEID Board Member —
KELLEY LINDQUIST Board Member —
MONA ANTILLA CARLONI Board President —
OLGA HERRERA Secretary —
RAJ V RAJAN Board Member —
RAJAN MENON Board President —
SHARON DAY Board Member —
SOYINI GUYTON Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DIPANKAR MUKHERJEE Artistic Director 7.2% of Rev
MEENA NATARAJAN EXECUTIVE DIR. 7.0% of Rev
DIPANKAR MUKHERJEE Artistic Director 6.8% of Rev
MEENA NATARAJAN EXECUTIVE DIR. 6.7% of Rev
AFSHAN ANJUM Board Member —
RAMONA ADVANI Board Member —
BERT WILSON Treasurer —
FREIDA MARTIN Board Member —
JUDI H OBEID Board Member —
KELLEY LINDQUIST Board Member —
MONA ANTILLA CARLONI Board President —
OLGA HERRERA Secretary —
RAJ V RAJAN Board Member —
RAJAN MENON Board President —
SHARON DAY Board Member —
SOYINI GUYTON Board Member —
AFSHAN ANJUM Board Member —
ANH THU T PHAM Board Member —
BERT WILSON Treasurer —
FREIDA MARTIN Board Member —
JUDI H OBEID Board Member —
KELLEY LINDQUIST Board Member —
MONA ANTILLA CARLONI Board President —
OLGA HERRERA Secretary —
RAJ V RAJAN Board Member —
RAJAN MENON Board President —
SHARON DAY Board Member —
SOYINI GUYTON Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
47 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 256 other orgs in MN with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 29 points above the peer median (60 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.