Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Acute Resource Divergence

What does this mean?

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

The Path Forward

The Realignment

Forces immediate balancing of administrative bloat against actual programmatic output. It demands that every dollar extracted for overhead be justified by community impact.

The Realignment
The Realignment
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Acute Resource Divergence
Overall
31
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
5
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Resource Divergence

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 11.4% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 9.1% 44 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2021 9.0% 42 Fragile Recovery
2020 8.8% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2019 11.2% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 9.5% 40 Financially Distressed Recovery
2017 7.7% 36 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2015 8.9% 36 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2014 5.7% 40 Financially Distressed Recovery
2013 17.9% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 36.3% 40 Fragile Gov Risk

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
EVE SCHULTE Executive Director 12.1% of Rev
JUSTINA ROBERTS Board President
MARTIN RIGNEY Board President
CONNIE BECK Treasurer
TOM ANDERSON Board Member
MICHAEL SNOW Board Member
HOLLY ZIEMER Board Member
GERALD TIMMPhD Board Member
SHEILA ASATO Board Member
KIM WITCZAK Board Member
LISA MALONEY-VINZ Board Member
JAMES MCCARTHY Board Member
NANCY WEINGARTNER MONROE Secretary
JACQUELINE GRIFFITH CROWLEY Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
EVE SCHULTE Executive Director 12.0% of Rev
JUSTINA ROBERTS Board President
MARTIN RIGNEY Board President
CONNIE BECK Treasurer
TOM ANDERSON Board Member
MICHAEL SNOW Board Member
HOLLY ZIEMER Board Member
GERALD TIMMPhD Board Member
SHEILA ASATO Board Member
KIM WITCZAK Board Member
LISA MALONEY-VINZ Board Member
JAMES MCCARTHY Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
EVE SCHULTE Executive Director 11.5% of Rev
EVE SCHULTE Executive Director 7.7% of Rev
GEORGE SUTTON Board Member 5.0% of Rev
TOM ANDERSON Board President
MARTIN RIGNEY Board President
JUSTINA ROBERTS Secretary
CONNIE BECK Treasurer
GAIL BUUCK Board Member
GERALD TIMMPhD Board Member
RANGA CHINONGOZA Board Member
LEIGH WILSON-MATTSON Board Member
LISA MALONEY-VINZ Board Member
KIM WITCZAK Board Member
JAMES MCCARTHY Board Member
HOLLY ZIEMER Board Member
MICHAEL SNOW Board Member
NICOLE BEHM-KOEP Board Member
TOM ANDERSON Board President
MARTIN RIGNEY Board President
JUSTINA ROBERTS Secretary
CONNIE BECK Treasurer
GEORGE SUTTON Board Member
GAIL BUUCK Board Member
GERALD TIMMPhD Board Member
SHEILA ASATO Board Member
NICOLE BEHM-KOEP Board Member
LISA MALONEY-VINZ Board Member
KIM WITCZAK Board Member
JAMES MCCARTHY Board Member
HOLLY ZIEMER Board Member
MICHAEL SNOW Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
5 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
31 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 174 other orgs in MN with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 33 points below the peer median (5 vs. 38).

5-year trend: Acute Resource Divergence

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.