Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit ↑
Overall
31
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
15
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden 23.8% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2022 — — 17.2% 39 Fragile Gov Risk
2021 — — 29.2% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2020 — — 26.9% 24 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2019 — — 35.0% 24 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 — — 18.6% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2017 — — 21.1% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 — — 23.1% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 — — 7.8% 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2014 — — 11.1% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2013 — — 17.3% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 — — 20.0% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2011 — — 23.8% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
AMY LINDSTROM Executive Director 19.1% of Rev
ANDREW GOOD ARTISITIC PRODUCTION —
JAY BECK Board President —
JODI MELIUS Board President —
JOSEPH MISH Board Member —
MARK NEVILLE Board Member —
MARY BETH SANCOMB-MORAN Secretary —
MATT ROISUM Treasurer —
RAFAEL JIMENEZ Board Member —
SARAH SCHAEFER MEIER Board Member —
ORIN LARSON Board Member —
AMY ANDREWS Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
AMY LINDSTROM Executive Director 16.1% of Rev
JERE LANTZ Artistic Director 13.4% of Rev
ANDREW GOOD Artistic Director —
BRAD KREHBIEL Board President —
BRUCE ROHDE Board Member —
JAMES SLOAN Board Member —
JAY BECK Board President —
JODI MELIUS Board President —
JOSEPH MISH Board Member —
MARK NEVILLE Board Member —
MARY BETH SANCOMB-MORAN Secretary —
MATT ROISUM Treasurer —
RAFAEL JIMENEZ Board Member —
SARAH SCHAEFER MEIER Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JERE LANTZ Executive Director 22.4% of Rev
AMY LINDSTROM Executive Director 14.0% of Rev
ANDREW GOOD ARTISITIC PRODUCTION —
BRAD KREHBIEL Board President —
BRUCE ROHDE Board Member —
JAMES SLOAN Board Member —
JAY BECK Board Member —
JODI MELIUS Board Member —
JOSEPH MISH Board Member —
MARION KLEINBERG Board Member —
MARK NEVILLE Board Member —
MARY BETH SANCOMB-MORAN Secretary —
MATT ROISUM Treasurer —
RAFAEL JIMENEZ Board Member —
SARAH SCHAEFER MEIER Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JERE LANTZ Executive Director 30.8% of Rev
AMY LINDSTROM Executive Director 11.1% of Rev
RAFAEL JIMENEZ Board Member —
MARION KLEINBERG Board Member —
BRUCE ROHDE Board Member —
JAMES SLOAN Board Member —
GLENN FORBES Board Member —
JODI MELIUS Board Member —
JOSEPH MISH Board Member —
MARK NEVILLE Board Member —
SARAH SCHAEFER MEIER Board Member —
BRENT TUNIS Board Member —
MATT ROISUM Treasurer —
MARY BETH SANCOMB-MORAN Secretary —
JAY BECK Board President —
BRAD KREHBIEL Board President —
ANDREW GOOD ARTISITIC PRODUCTION —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
15 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
31 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 256 other orgs in MN with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 36 points below the peer median (15 vs. 51).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.