Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Acute Resource Divergence

What does this mean?

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

The Path Forward

The Realignment

Forces immediate balancing of administrative bloat against actual programmatic output. It demands that every dollar extracted for overhead be justified by community impact.

The Realignment
The Realignment
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Acute Resource Divergence
Overall
20
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Resource Divergence

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 38.7% 20 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2022 20.8% 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2021 16.9% 43 Fragile Recovery
2020 18.3% 39 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2019 24.2% 43 Fragile Recovery
2018 11.3% 39 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 14.8% 39 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 10.9% 39 Fragile Recovery
2015 16.8% 41 Fragile Recovery
2014 18.1% 24 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 18.6% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 17.2% 39 Financially Distressed Recovery
2011 11.3% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
AARON CARPENTER Artistic Director 39.5% of Rev
DENISE FANDEL Board President
JOEL BARTEN Board President
SUZY ELLIS Secretary
BR JACOB BERNS Treasurer
MICHELE DANIELSON Board Member
AKSEL KRAFNICK Board Member
STEFANIE ROTHSTEIN Board Member
JENNIFER WHITEHEAD Board Member

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
AARON CARPENTER Artistic Director 38.7% of Rev
JOEL BARTEN Board President
DENISE FANDEL Board President
BR JACOB BERNS OSB Treasurer
LISA TREANOR Board President
MICHELE DANIELSON PARENT REPRESENTATIVE
MARY JO LEIGHTON Board Member
AKSEL KRAFNICK Board Member
STEVEN BRESNAHAN Board Member
SUZY ELLIS Secretary

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
AARON CARPENTER Artistic Director 12.9% of Rev
DENISE FANDEL Board President
JOEL BARTEN Board President
KATIE DUSING Board President
NANCY FANDEL Board Member
MARY JO LEIGHTON Board Member
SUZY ELLIS Board Member
BR JACOB BERNS Board Member
SARAH MALONEY Board Member
LISA TREANOR Secretary
ANDREW ULBRICHT Treasurer

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ANGELA KLAVERKAMP Executive Director 14.9% of Rev
AARON VANDANACKER Artistic Director 10.3% of Rev
DENISE FANDEL Board President
JOEL BARTEN Board President
LISA SCHROERS Secretary
ANDY ULBRICHT Treasurer
KATIE DUSING Board President
FR NICK KLEESPIE Board Member
NANCY FANDEL Board Member
ALYSSA BRANDVOLD Board Member
MARY JO LEIGHTON Board Member
SUZY ELLIS Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ANGELA KLAVERKAMP Executive Director 26.4% of Rev
ANDRE HEYWOOD Artistic Director 14.7% of Rev
AARON VANDANACKER Artistic Director 9.2% of Rev
DENISE FANDEL Board President
JOEL BARTEN Board President
LISA SCHROERS Secretary
ANDY ULBRICHT Treasurer
KATIE DUSING Board President
FR NICK KLEESPIE Board Member
NANCY FANDEL Board Member
ALYSSA BRANDVOLD Board Member
MARY JO LEIGHTON Board Member
SUZY ELLIS Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
20 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Fewer than 3 peers found in MN for this NTEE subcategory; peer comparison would not be statistically meaningful.

5-year trend: Acute Resource Divergence

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 38.7% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~33 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.