Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Compensation Escalation Cycle

What does this mean?

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

The Path Forward

The Steward

Re-establishes board supremacy over executive extraction. It freezes compensation and mandates that all future financial rewards be tied strictly to verifiable mission expansion.

The Steward
The Steward
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle
Overall
43
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
65
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Compensation Escalation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 32.4% 43 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2022 36.0% 43 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2021 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 3.7% 54 Fragile Recovery
2019 16.1% 46 Fragile Decline Risk
2018 55 Fragile Recovery
2016 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2015 45 Fragile Decline Risk
2014 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 47 Fragile Recovery
2011 43 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SUSAN OLSON Board Member 13.5% of Rev
CRYSTAL OLSON Secretary 10.6% of Rev
ZACH SONNEK Board Member 6.5% of Rev
ROBB WENDT Board Member 3.3% of Rev
ALYSSA SURRETT OPERATIONS MGR 0.3% of Rev
BEN BARTUSEK Board Member
SERGIO SALGADO Board Member
MAGGIE MAES Board Member
MURPHY GROTEWOLD Board President
LAURA JANS Treasurer
SARAH OLSON Board President
LAUREN ATCHLEY Board Member
AARON STUVE Board Member
CALLIE SONNEK Board Member
KEITH STEINKE Board Member
JAMES VAN OORT Board Member

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SUSAN OLSON Board Member 22.8% of Rev
ZACH SONNEK Board Member 8.1% of Rev
MICHELLE PARSNEAU Board Member 1.6% of Rev
BEN BARTUSEK Board Member
SERGIO SALGADO Board Member
MAGGIE MAES Board Member
MURPHY GROTEWOLD Board President
LAURA JANS Treasurer
SARAH OLSON Board President
LAUREN ATCHLEY Board Member
CALLIE SONNEK Board Member
KEITH STEINKE Board Member
CRYSTAL OLSON Secretary
JAMES VAN OORT Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SUSAN OLSON Board Member 18.8% of Rev
LEANNE STEINKE OPS MGR 7.2% of Rev
MAGGIE MAES Board Member 5.9% of Rev
JUSTIN DANIELSON Board Member 3.9% of Rev
ZACH BOLLAND Board Member 2.5% of Rev
JOSHUA PERRY Board Member
MURPHY GROTEWOLD Board President
LAURA JANS Treasurer
SARAH OLSON Board President
LAUREN ATCHLEY Board Member
KENDRA BRAUNGER Board Member
CALLIE SONNEK Board Member
KEITH STEINKE Board Member
CRYSTAL OLSON Secretary
JAMES VAN OORT Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SUSAN OLSON Board Member 8.5% of Rev
MAGGIE MAES Board Member 3.3% of Rev
SUSAN OLSON Board Member 3.0% of Rev
JUSTIN DANIELSON Board President
SARAH TETZLOFF Board President
GINA ANDERSON Secretary
MURPHY GROTEWOLD Board Member
JUSTIN DANIELSON Treasurer
SARAH TETZLOFF Board President
GINA ANDERSON Board Member
MAGGIE MAES Board Member
MURPHY GROTEWOLD Board President
LAURA JANS Secretary
SARAH ASP OLSON Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
65 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
43 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 174 other orgs in MN with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 28 points above the peer median (65 vs. 37).

5-year trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 32.4% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~21 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.