Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Acute Resource Divergence

What does this mean?

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

The Path Forward

The Realignment

Forces immediate balancing of administrative bloat against actual programmatic output. It demands that every dollar extracted for overhead be justified by community impact.

The Realignment
The Realignment
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Acute Resource Divergence ↓
Overall
21
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Resource Divergence

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2020 — — 49.1% 21 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 — — 21.1% 38 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 — — 29.7% 39 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2017 — — 25.5% 41 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2016 — — 21.3% 51 Fragile Recovery
2015 — — 21.3% 47 Fragile Gov Risk
2014 — — 20.7% 51 Fragile Recovery
2013 — — 7.3% 52 Fragile Recovery
2012 — — 20.6% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2011 — — 22.9% 37 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Ann Huntrods Board President —
Doug Johnson Board President —
Emily Skor Secretary —
Bob Nelson Treasurer —
Kathleen Biebl Board Member —
Robert Davidson Board Member —
Sidney Emery Board Member —
Alex Haecker Board Member —
John Kaul Board Member —
Linda Mack Board Member —
Warren Mack Board Member —
Caroline Marshall Board Member —
Lowell Noteboom Board Member —
Sonja Noteboom Board Member —
Peter Richter Board Member —
Tom Rogers Board Member —
Katherine Skor Board Member —
Mary Streitz Board Member —
Virginia Stringer Board Member —
Susan Chandler Executive Dir. —
Dale Deines Dir-Operations —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Susan Chandler Executive Dir. 23.2% of Rev
Dale Deines Dir-Operations 15.0% of Rev
Ann Huntrods Board President —
Doug Johnson Board President —
Emily Skor Secretary —
Bob Nelson Treasurer —
Kathleen Biebl Board Member —
Robert Davidson Board Member —
Sidney Emery Board Member —
Alex Haecker Board Member —
John Kaul Board Member —
Linda Mack Board Member —
Warren Mack Board Member —
Caroline Marshall Board Member —
Lowell Noteboom Board Member —
Sonja Noteboom Board Member —
Peter Richter Board Member —
Tom Rogers Board Member —
Katherine Skor Board Member —
Mary Streitz Board Member —
Virginia Stringer Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
21 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 257 other orgs in MN with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 51 points below the peer median (0 vs. 51).

5-year trend: Acute Resource Divergence

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

Overall score has gone from 51 → 21 over 5 years (declining by 30 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 49.1% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~40 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.