Steady State
What does this mean?
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
The Path Forward
The Stewardship
Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.
Institutional Epochs
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Hidden | Hidden | — | — | Unknown | — | |
| 2024 | Hidden | Hidden | — | — | Unknown | — | |
| 2023 | Hidden | Hidden | 11.8% | 29 | Critical Intervention Needed | Decline Risk | |
| 2022 | — | — | — | 27 | Critical Intervention Needed | Decline Risk | |
| 2021 | — | — | 8.9% | 35 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2020 | — | — | 13.5% | 29 | Critical Intervention Needed | Stable Watch | |
| 2019 | — | — | — | 29 | Critical Intervention Needed | Stable Watch | |
| 2018 | — | — | — | 29 | Critical Intervention Needed | Decline Risk | |
| 2017 | — | — | — | 33 | Critical Intervention Needed | Decline Risk | |
| 2016 | — | — | — | 41 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2015 | — | — | — | 37 | Fragile | Decline Risk | |
| 2014 | — | — | — | 47 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2013 | — | — | — | 41 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2012 | — | — | — | 33 | Critical Intervention Needed | Stable Watch |
Officer compensation history
Tax year 2026
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NAVASHA KLAPOTZ | BUSINESS MAN | 11.8% of Rev | ||
| JAMES WAFLER | Board President | — | ||
| TRISTEN HELLER | VICE PRESIDE | — | ||
| TOM KOTVAL | Treasurer | — | ||
| LINA BELAR | Board Member | — | ||
| MARY CLEMENT | Board Member | — | ||
| DEAN FITCH | Board Member | — | ||
| KYLE BROWN | Board Member | — | ||
| KATIE BRIMHALL | Board Member | — | ||
| SUSAN KAVANAUGH | Board Member | — | ||
| MICHELL SAKRY-WINKELMAN | Board Member | — | ||
| MELISSA VONITTER | Board Member | — | ||
| PAM WIBLE | Board Member | — |
Tax year 2025
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NAVASHA KLAPOTZ | BUSINESS MAN | 11.8% of Rev | ||
| JAMES WAFLER | Board President | — | ||
| DAVID THOMPSON | VICE PRESIDE | — | ||
| TOM KOTVAL | Treasurer | — | ||
| LINA BELAR | Board Member | — | ||
| MARY CLEMENT | Board Member | — | ||
| DEAN FITCH | Board Member | — | ||
| BONNIE GRONEBERG | Board Member | — | ||
| TRISTAN HELLER | Board Member | — | ||
| SUSAN KAVANAUGH | Board Member | — | ||
| MICHELL SAKRY-WINKELMAN | Board Member | — | ||
| PAM WIBLE | Board Member | — |
Tax year 2023
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NAVASHA KLAPOTZ | BUSINESS MAN | 10.2% of Rev | ||
| DEAN FITCH | Board President | — | ||
| JAMES WAFLER | VICE PRESIDE | — | ||
| TOM KOTVAL | Treasurer | — | ||
| MONA STEINKE | Board Member | — | ||
| BETTY ALDERMAN | Board Member | — | ||
| DEB GRIFFITH | Board Member | — | ||
| MARY CLEMENT | Board Member | — | ||
| SUSAN KAVANAUGH | Board Member | — | ||
| DON WENNBERG | Board Member | — | ||
| MICHELL SAKRY-WINKELMAN | Board Member | — | ||
| LINA BELAR | Board Member | — | ||
| PETER VOGEL | Board Member | — | ||
| DAVID THOMPSON | Board Member | — | ||
| BONNIE GRONEBERG | Board Member | — |
Tax year 2021
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NAVASHA KLAPOTZ | BUSINESS MAN | 10.2% of Rev | ||
| DEAN FITCH | Board President | — | ||
| JAMES WAFLER | VICE PRESIDE | — | ||
| TOM KOTVAL | Treasurer | — | ||
| MONA STEINKE | Board Member | — | ||
| BETTY ALDERMAN | Board Member | — | ||
| DEB GRIFFITH | Board Member | — | ||
| MARY CLEMENT | Board Member | — | ||
| SUSAN KAVANAUGH | Board Member | — | ||
| DON WENNBERG | Board Member | — | ||
| MICHELL SAKRY-WINKELMAN | Board Member | — | ||
| LINA BELAR | Board Member | — | ||
| PETER VOGEL | Board Member | — | ||
| DAVID THOMPSON | Board Member | — | ||
| BONNIE GRONEBERG | Board Member | — |
Score breakdown
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Compared to 175 other orgs in MN with NTEE prefix A6.
Most-divergent component: financial score sits 17 points below the peer median (20 vs. 37).
5-year trend: Steady State
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
What's driving this score
- Comp-to-revenue ratio of 11.8% sits within the sector's healthy band (18–22%).
- Financial resilience score in the bottom quartile — reserves and liabilities ratios warrant review.
What would change this score
The two changes that would most improve this score:
- Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.