Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↓
Overall
29
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
20
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden 11.8% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 — — — 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 — — 8.9% 35 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — 13.5% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2019 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2018 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 — — — 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 — — — 41 Fragile Recovery
2015 — — — 37 Fragile Decline Risk
2014 — — — 47 Fragile Recovery
2013 — — — 41 Fragile Recovery
2012 — — — 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
NAVASHA KLAPOTZ BUSINESS MAN 11.8% of Rev
JAMES WAFLER Board President —
TRISTEN HELLER VICE PRESIDE —
TOM KOTVAL Treasurer —
LINA BELAR Board Member —
MARY CLEMENT Board Member —
DEAN FITCH Board Member —
KYLE BROWN Board Member —
KATIE BRIMHALL Board Member —
SUSAN KAVANAUGH Board Member —
MICHELL SAKRY-WINKELMAN Board Member —
MELISSA VONITTER Board Member —
PAM WIBLE Board Member —

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
NAVASHA KLAPOTZ BUSINESS MAN 11.8% of Rev
JAMES WAFLER Board President —
DAVID THOMPSON VICE PRESIDE —
TOM KOTVAL Treasurer —
LINA BELAR Board Member —
MARY CLEMENT Board Member —
DEAN FITCH Board Member —
BONNIE GRONEBERG Board Member —
TRISTAN HELLER Board Member —
SUSAN KAVANAUGH Board Member —
MICHELL SAKRY-WINKELMAN Board Member —
PAM WIBLE Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
NAVASHA KLAPOTZ BUSINESS MAN 10.2% of Rev
DEAN FITCH Board President —
JAMES WAFLER VICE PRESIDE —
TOM KOTVAL Treasurer —
MONA STEINKE Board Member —
BETTY ALDERMAN Board Member —
DEB GRIFFITH Board Member —
MARY CLEMENT Board Member —
SUSAN KAVANAUGH Board Member —
DON WENNBERG Board Member —
MICHELL SAKRY-WINKELMAN Board Member —
LINA BELAR Board Member —
PETER VOGEL Board Member —
DAVID THOMPSON Board Member —
BONNIE GRONEBERG Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
NAVASHA KLAPOTZ BUSINESS MAN 10.2% of Rev
DEAN FITCH Board President —
JAMES WAFLER VICE PRESIDE —
TOM KOTVAL Treasurer —
MONA STEINKE Board Member —
BETTY ALDERMAN Board Member —
DEB GRIFFITH Board Member —
MARY CLEMENT Board Member —
SUSAN KAVANAUGH Board Member —
DON WENNBERG Board Member —
MICHELL SAKRY-WINKELMAN Board Member —
LINA BELAR Board Member —
PETER VOGEL Board Member —
DAVID THOMPSON Board Member —
BONNIE GRONEBERG Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
20 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
29 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 257 other orgs in MN with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 31 points below the peer median (20 vs. 51).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.