Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
31
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 Hidden Hidden 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2022 5.8% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2021 15.2% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2020 6.5% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2019 4.5% 35 Financially Distressed Recovery
2018 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2017 4.3% 35 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2016 5.9% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2015 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2014 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2013 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2012 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2011 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KEVIN RAMACH Executive Director 4.4% of Rev
TERRYL BRUMM Board Member
MARY CHOATE Board Member
JANE CHRONISTER Board Member
NATHAN COUTLER Board Member
JOHN GIBBS Board Member
LISA GUZEK MONTAGNE Board Member
JERRY KEMP Treasurer
LINDSAY KORSTANGE Board Member
ANNETTE LEE Secretary
PATRICK MILAN Board President
KAREN NORDSTROM Board Member
KATE PEHRSON Board Member
SHELLEY PETERSON Board Member
MARY PRENTNIEKS Board President
ARTHUR TURNER Board Member
JAMIE VERBRUGGE Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KEVIN RAMACH Board Member 4.4% of Rev
PAUL ZECH Board President
MARY PRENTNIEKS Board President
JERRY KEMP Treasurer
LINDSAY KORSTANGE Secretary
JACK BALOGA EX-OFFICIO
JAMIE VERBRUGGE EX-OFFICIO
MARY CHOATE Board Member
JANE CHRONSITER Board Member
JOHN GIBBS Board Member
LISA GUZEK MONTAGNE Board Member
AMY LUEDERS Board Member
PATRICK MILAN Board Member
KAREN NORDSTROM Board Member
KATE PEHRSON Board Member
LAURA DAVIDA PREVES Board Member
BRIAN PRENTICE Board Member
KAREN SNEDEKER Board Member
GREG WOLSKY Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ANDREA SPECHT Board Member 2.4% of Rev
KEVIN RAMACH Board Member 2.1% of Rev
PAUL ZECH Board President
LAURA DAVIDA PREVES Board President
AMY LUEDERS Treasurer
LINDSAY KORSTANGE Secretary
MARY CHOATE Board Member
JANE CHRONISTER Board Member
JOHN GIBBS Board Member
JERRY KEMP Board Member
LISA GUZEK MONTAGNE Board Member
PATRICK MILAN Board Member
KAREN NORDSTROM Board Member
KATE PEHRSON Board Member
BRIAN PRENTICE Board Member
MARY PRENTNIEKS Board Member
KAREN SNEDEKER Board Member
GREG WOLSKY Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
31 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 47 other orgs in MN with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 36 points below the peer median (0 vs. 36).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

Overall score has gone from 35 → 31 over 5 years (declining by 4 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.