Mission Drift
Mission Drift
Mission Drift Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Mission Drift

What does this mean?

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

The Path Forward

The Lodestar

A radical recommitment to the core mission. It requires the organization to gain the strength to say 'no' to restricted funding that pulls them away from their true purpose.

The Lodestar
The Lodestar
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Mission Drift ↑
Overall
42
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
25
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Mission Drift

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 — — — 42 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2022 — — — 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 — — 10.5% 49 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — 18.6% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 — — 11.3% 40 Fragile Recovery
2018 — — 12.6% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 — — 7.8% 42 Fragile Recovery
2016 — — 11.6% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 — — 8.1% 40 Fragile Recovery
2014 — — 11.3% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 — — — 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 — — — 36 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2011 — — 7.8% 48 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Malia Burkhart Board President —
Ellen Alphonso Treasurer —
Adrian Cox-Thurmond Secretary —
Lacinea McBride Board Member —
Erin Emory Board Member —
Scott Muskin Board Member —
Kallie Melvin Board Member —
Caspian Wirth Board Member —
Cecilia Benimon Board Member —
Elina Kotlyar Executive Director —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CLAIRE CURRAN CO INTERIM EXECUTIVE DIREC —
LISA MARIE BRIMMER CO INTERIM EXECUTIVE DIREC —
MALIA BURKHART Board President —
LACI MCBRIDE Board Member —
SCOTT MUSKIN Board President —
KALLIE MELVIN Board Member —
TIA LAUVE Secretary —
KATIE PEACOCK Board Member —
LAURA WILHELM Board President —
ADEDOTUN SALAMI Board President —
ANITA NEWHOUSE Treasurer —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CLAIRE CURRAN CO INTERIM EXECUTIVE DIREC 8.0% of Rev
LISA MARIE BRIMMER CO INTERIM EXECUTIVE DIREC 7.7% of Rev
TIA LAUVE Board Member —
KATIE PEACOCK Board Member —
LAURA WILHELM Board President —
ADEDOTUN SALAMI Board President —
ANITA NEWHOUSE Board Member —
MALIA BURKHART Board President —
ROSA RAARUP Board Member —
CLAIRE GRAUPMANN Board Member —
SCOTT MUSKIN Board Member —
VICTORIA IGOE Treasurer —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CLAIRE CURRAN Executive Director 14.9% of Rev
CORRIE ZOLL Board Member 11.9% of Rev
LISA MARIE BRIMMER Executive Director 4.0% of Rev
MALIA BURKHART Board Member —
ROSA RAARUP Board Member —
CLAIRE GRAUPMANN Secretary —
ALEX HAECKER Board Member —
VICTORIA IGOE Treasurer —
KAREN BROWN Board Member —
KATIE PEACOCK Board Member —
LAURA WILHELM Board President —
ADEDOTUN SALAMI Board Member —
TAMIKO FRENCH Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
25 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
42 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 256 other orgs in MN with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 26 points below the peer median (25 vs. 51).

5-year trend: Mission Drift

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.