Acute Stabilization
Acute Stabilization
Acute Stabilization Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Acute Stabilization

What does this mean?

A successful crisis intervention. After hitting the Priority Review risk tier, the organization demonstrates consecutive years of Financial Score recovery paired with Governance Score improvement.

The Path Forward

The Dawn

Institutionalizes the emergency protocols that saved the organization. It locks in new, rigorous governance policies to prevent a relapse into crisis.

The Dawn
The Dawn
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Acute Stabilization
Overall
44
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
25
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Acute Stabilization

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 7.8% 44 Fragile Recovery
2022 6.6% 40 Fragile Recovery
2021 17.1% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2020 3.0% 35 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2019 6.9% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 8.1% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2017 6.6% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2016 8.3% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2015 8.5% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2014 7.6% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2013 9.1% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2012 7.2% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2011 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MISHA JOHNSON Board Member 7.8% of Rev
LINDSEY DUOOS WILLIAMS Artistic Director 6.4% of Rev
JACLYN JUNE JOHNSON Board Member 1.7% of Rev
LARRY SINAK Treasurer
PAUL MCCARTAN Board President
LAURA QUEST Secretary
MELISSA ADAMS-GOIHL Board President
ERIC DECKER Board Member
DEBBIE FUEHRER Board Member
RAQUEL HELLMAN Board Member
MELISSA ADAMS-GOIHL Board President
JUDY HICKEY Board Member
PAUL MCCARTAN Board President
ROSILYN STEINKAMP Board Member
LARRY SINAK Treasurer
RAQUEL HELLMAN Secretary
MISSY HAGEN Board Member
LAUREL PODULKE-SMITH Board Member
JUDY HICKEY Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MISHA JOHNSON Board Member 7.1% of Rev
MELISSA ADAMS-GOIHL Board President
MISSY HAGEN Board President
LARRY SINAK Treasurer
LAUREL PODULKE Secretary
RAQUEL HELLMAN Board Member
PAUL MCCARTAN Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MISHA JOHNSON Board Member 3.0% of Rev
MELISSA ADAMS-GOIHL Board President
MISSY HAGEN Board President
LARRY SINAK Treasurer
LAUREL PODULKE Secretary
RAQUEL HELLMAN Board Member
PAUL MCCARTAN Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KEVIN MILLER RESIGNED Executive Director 7.3% of Rev
MISHA JOHNSON Board Member 0.7% of Rev
ARI KOLAS RESIGNED Treasurer
JEFF HAYNES RESIGNED Secretary
KAY HOCKER RESIGNED Board President
GINGER ROBERTS CARSON Board Member
JERRY KVASNICKA RESIGNED Board Member
DEBI NEVILLE Board Member
CHAD CAMPBELL RESIGNED Board Member
GREG GENTLING RESIGNED Board Member
BARI AMADIO RESIGNED Board Member
BECCA STILES-NOGOSEK RESIGNED Board Member
JEAN MARVIN RESIGNED Board Member
DIANNA PARKS RESIGNED Board Member
BRADLEY HERR RESIGNED Board Member
EMILY WATKINS Board President
MELISSA ADAMS-GOIHL Board President
ANNIE LANDKAMMER Treasurer
MISSY HAGEN Secretary
LAWRENCE SINAK Board Member
KAMI SIM Board Member
LAUREL PODULKE-SMITH Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
25 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
44 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 174 other orgs in MN with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 29 points above the peer median (60 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Acute Stabilization

A successful crisis intervention. After hitting the Priority Review risk tier, the organization demonstrates consecutive years of Financial Score recovery paired with Governance Score improvement.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).
  2. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.