Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Acute Resource Divergence

What does this mean?

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

The Path Forward

The Realignment

Forces immediate balancing of administrative bloat against actual programmatic output. It demands that every dollar extracted for overhead be justified by community impact.

The Realignment
The Realignment
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Acute Resource Divergence ↓
Overall
25
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Resource Divergence

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden 22.5% 25 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 — — 21.7% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 — — 20.0% 47 Fragile Gov Risk
2020 — — 14.9% 49 Fragile Recovery
2019 — — 17.6% 39 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2018 — — 14.2% 45 Fragile Recovery
2017 — — 18.8% 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2016 — — 16.1% 41 Fragile Recovery
2015 — — 18.4% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 — — 16.9% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 — — 13.6% 45 Fragile Recovery
2012 — — — 37 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JONATHAN WINKLE Executive Director 22.5% of Rev
HEATHER KESZLER Board Member 16.3% of Rev
JONATHAN WINKLE Executive Director 8.7% of Rev
DARLENE RIVEST Board Member —
CLAUDETTE KOLOSOWSKI Board Member —
PETER REYNOLDS Board Member —
LESLEY WALKER Board Member —
TAMMY ROSENBERG Board Member —
NANCY DEKRAAY Board Member —
GREG BARRON Board Member —
SHELLY WRUCK Board President —
PETER REYNOLDS Board President —
MARK FELDMANN Secretary —
TRACY LUTTERMAN Treasurer —
PETER REYNOLDS Board President —
SHELLY WRUCK Board President —
TRACY LUTTERMAN Treasurer —
MARK FELDMANN Secretary —
GREG BARRON Board Member —
NANCY DEKRAAY Board Member —
CLAUDETTE KOLOSOWSKI Board Member —
DARLENE RIVEST Board Member —
PETER REYNOLDS Board Member —
TAMMY ROSENBERG Board Member —
LESLEY WALKER Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JONATHAN WINKLE Executive Director 16.9% of Rev
PETER REYNOLDS Board President —
SHARON RAMQUIST Board President —
SHELLY WRUCK Board President —
TRACY LUTTERMAN Treasurer —
LINDA O'CONNELL Secretary —
MARK FELDMANN Board Member —
LESLEY WALKER Board Member —
CLAUDETTE KOLOSOWSKI Board Member —
DARLENE RIVEST Board Member —
WILLIAM MATHIS Board Member —
ANTON SCODWELL Board Member —
DALE SAVIN Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ELIZABETH BENDER Executive Director 14.7% of Rev
SHARON RAMQUIST Board President —
SHELLY WRUCK Board President —
STEVE MCLAUGHLIN Treasurer —
LINDA O'CONNELL Secretary —
RHONDA DENEKA Board Member —
MARK FELDMANN Board Member —
JUSTIN PETERMAN Board Member —
CARRIE RICHMOND Board Member —
LESLEY WALKER Board Member —
JONATHAN WINKLE Executive Director —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
25 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 183 other orgs in WI with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 56 points below the peer median (0 vs. 56).

5-year trend: Acute Resource Divergence

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.