Steady State
What does this mean?
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
The Path Forward
The Stewardship
Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.
Title
Representative Institutions
Institutional Epochs
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | — | — | — | 52 | Fragile | Stable Watch | |
| 2021 | Hidden | Hidden | 9.4% | 54 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2020 | — | — | 14.2% | 45 | Fragile | Decline Risk | |
| 2019 | — | — | 12.3% | 47 | Fragile | Gov Risk | |
| 2018 | — | — | 12.3% | 47 | Fragile | Gov Risk | |
| 2017 | — | — | 10.7% | 51 | Fragile | Gov Risk | |
| 2016 | — | — | 9.5% | 52 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2015 | — | — | 13.3% | 45 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2014 | — | — | 11.1% | 43 | Fragile | Gov Risk | |
| 2013 | — | — | 7.9% | 54 | Fragile | Stable Watch | |
| 2012 | — | — | 8.3% | 50 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2011 | — | — | — | 45 | Fragile | Stable Watch |
Officer compensation history
Tax year 2021
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BILLY ESTES | EXECUTIVE DIR. | 8.4% of Rev | ||
| STEW RUSCH | Board Member | — | ||
| CRISTINA KARPF | Board Member | — | ||
| LAURIE ALKIRE | Board Member | — | ||
| PHIL KELLY | Board President | — | ||
| BILL PETERS | EX, OFFICIO OFFICER | — | ||
| MARY ROBINSON | Secretary | — | ||
| DICK MEYER | Board Member | — | ||
| JEFF TRACY | Board President | — | ||
| SHARYN WOHLERS | Treasurer | — | ||
| MARILYN RAHMIG | Board Member | — | ||
| TRACY STEELE | Board Member | — |
Score breakdown
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Compared to 19 other orgs in NE with NTEE prefix A1.
Most-divergent component: program score sits 30 points above the peer median (60 vs. 30).
5-year trend: Steady State
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
Overall score has gone from 47 → 52 over 5 years (improving by 5 points).
What's driving this score
- No individual risk drivers stand out. Overall score reflects component balance, not any single signal.
What would change this score
No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.