Institutional Maturation
Institutional Maturation
Institutional Maturation Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Institutional Maturation

What does this mean?

The gold standard. 10-year slow, steady, concurrent growth across Financial Health, Governance, and Program. Leadership is scaling their oversight and impact in lockstep.

The Path Forward

The Crown

A mandate to lead the sector. It encourages the organization to mentor emerging nonprofits and embark on generational capital projects, leveraging their profound stability.

The Crown
The Crown
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Institutional Maturation ↑
Overall
44
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
25
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Institutional Maturation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden 5.8% 44 Fragile Stable Watch
2022 — — 6.3% 44 Fragile Stable Watch
2021 — — 4.8% 45 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — 3.0% 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2019 — — 7.2% 44 Fragile Recovery
2018 — — 8.8% 38 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2017 — — 9.1% 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2016 — — — 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2015 — — — 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2014 — — — 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2013 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 — — — 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2011 — — — 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CAREY ZAWLOCKI Executive Director 5.8% of Rev
FALICIA HINES Board President —
JP CROAKE Treasurer —
LUCY GREIMEL Secretary —
SARAH BAHAUDDIN Board Member —
RACHEL ELLETT Board Member —
RYANN FOELKER Board Member —
EMILY GRIFFITH Board Member —
JEN GUNDRY Board Member —
ANN MCDERMOTT Board Member —
LINDSEY PEETERS Board Member —
RALPH RUSSO Board Member —
SEEP PALIWAL Board President —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CAREY ZAWLOCKI Executive Director 4.8% of Rev
MEGHAN KRAUSE Board President —
MEGAN PURTELL Board President —
EMILY BALSLEY Board Member —
EVE GALANTER Board Member —
RACHEL WERNER Board Member —
LUCY GREIMEL Board Member —
JP CROAKE Board Member —
RALPH RUSSO Board Member —
CHUCK BAUER Board Member —
SEEP PALIWAL Board Member —
ANN MCDERMOTT Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CAREY ZAWLOCKI Executive Director 2.4% of Rev
MEGHAN KRAUSE Board President —
MEGAN PURTELL Board President —
RALPH RUSSO Treasurer —
EMILY BALSLEY Board Member —
EVE GALANTER Board Member —
RACHEL WERNER Board Member —
LUCY GREIMEL Board Member —
JP CROAKE Board Member —
CHUCK BAUER Board Member —
SEEP PALIWAL Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MONICA WAHLBERG THRU MAY Executive Director 5.9% of Rev
JULIA KERR Board President —
MEGAN PURTELL Board President —
COLLEEN CARMONA Treasurer —
EMILY BALSLEY Board Member —
EVE GALANTER Board Member —
THERESA MCARDLE Board Member —
DANA SCHECKEL Board Member —
MEGHAN KRAUSE Board Member —
MCKENZIE GLYN-ZDRALE Board Member —
JP CROAKE Board Member —
RALPH RUSSO Board Member —
CHUCK BAUER Board Member —
CAREY ZAWLOCKI BEG JUNE Executive Director —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
25 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
44 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 94 other orgs in WI with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 48 points below the peer median (25 vs. 73).

5-year trend: Institutional Maturation

The gold standard. 10-year slow, steady, concurrent growth across Financial Health, Governance, and Program. Leadership is scaling their oversight and impact in lockstep.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.