Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
33
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
20
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2022 17.7% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2020 37 Fragile Recovery
2019 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2017 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2015 25 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 37 Financially Distressed Recovery
2012 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2011 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Michelle Owczarski Board President
Michelle Young Board President
Emiliio DeTorre Board Member
Tyler Hull Board Member
Azeeza Islam Board Member
Ronald Fry Board Member
Debra Fabian Board Member
Susan Fry Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Susan Fry Executive Director 16.0% of Rev
Ron Scot Fry Board Member 1.3% of Rev
Michelle Owczarski Board President
Michelle Young Board President
Emilio De Torre Board Member
Tyler Hull Board Member
Azeeza Islam Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
20 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
33 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 103 other orgs in WI with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 17 points below the peer median (20 vs. 37).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.