Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↑
Overall
46
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
55
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 — — — 46 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 — — — 45 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 — — — 44 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 — — — 48 Fragile Recovery
2019 — — — 44 Fragile Recovery
2018 — — — 35 Fragile Decline Risk
2017 — — — 43 Fragile Recovery
2016 — — — 39 Fragile Decline Risk
2015 — — — 45 Fragile Decline Risk
2014 — — — 47 Fragile Recovery
2013 — — — 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 — — — 43 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 — — — 43 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Charles R Wellington Board President —
Patt Carter Board Member —
Marilyn Pfarr Treasurer —
Mary Soddy Secretary —
Joe Najat Board Member —
Julie Wilke Board Member —
Marie Perry Board Member —
Ron Spielman Board Member —
Richard Rote Board Member —
Martha Etter Luedeking Board Member —
Bobbie Bernet Board Member —
Gof Thompson Board Member —

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Charles R Wellington Board President —
Patt Carter Board Member —
Marilyn Pfarr Treasurer —
Mary Soddy Secretary —
Joe Najat Board Member —
Julie Wilke Board Member —
Ron Spielman Board Member —
Richard Rote Board Member —
Martha Etter Luedeking Board Member —
Bobbie Bernet Board Member —
Gof Thompson Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Charles R Wellington Board President —
Patt Carter Board Member —
Marilyn Pfarr Treasurer —
Mary Soddy Board Member —
Deb Thompson Board Member —
Pat Behring Board Member —
Ron Spielman Board Member —
Richard Rote Board Member —
Martha Etter Luedeking Board Member —
Bobbie Bernet Board Member —
Gof Thompson Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Charles R Wellington Board President —
Patt Carter Board Member —
Marilyn Pfarr Treasurer —
Deb Thompson Board Member —
Pat Behring Board Member —
Dr Jan Erlandson Board Member —
Ron Spielman Board Member —
Richard Rote Board Member —
Martha Etter Luedeking Board Member —
Bobbie Bernet Board Member —
Lee Knuteson Board Member —
Gof Thompson Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Charles R Wellington Board President —
Mary L Soddy Secretary —
Marilyn Pfarr Treasurer —
Lois Kaster Board Member —
Robert Knudtson Board President —
Deb Thompson Board Member —
Pat Behring Board Member —
Mary Schmid Board Member —
Dr Jan Erlandson Board Member —
Ron Spielman Board Member —
Dick Rote Board Member —
Martha Etter Luedking Board Member —
Bobbi Bernet Board Member —
Chris Knuteson Board Member —
Gof Thompson Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
55 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
46 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 183 other orgs in WI with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: governance score sits 15 points below the peer median (50 vs. 65).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.