Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Compensation Escalation Cycle

What does this mean?

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

The Path Forward

The Steward

Re-establishes board supremacy over executive extraction. It freezes compensation and mandates that all future financial rewards be tied strictly to verifiable mission expansion.

The Steward
The Steward
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle ↓
Overall
30
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
15
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Compensation Escalation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 — — 27.8% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2022 — — 22.1% 39 Fragile Gov Risk
2021 — — 29.0% 38 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2020 — — 14.8% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2019 — — 16.4% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 — — 14.3% 41 Financially Distressed Recovery
2017 — — 15.2% 39 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2016 — — 11.7% 45 Fragile Recovery
2015 — — 20.1% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2014 — — 19.2% 35 Fragile Gov Risk
2013 — — 18.7% 37 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 — — 17.7% 37 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Saira Frank Executive Dir. 27.4% of Rev
Kari Kastenholz Board President —
Alyssa Kubishak Treasurer —
Emily Whalley Board President —
Kaitlyn Konrardy Secretary —
David Coe Board Member —
Cheryl Bensman-Rowe Board Member —
Julia Valgento Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Saira Frank Executive Dir. 27.6% of Rev
SAIRA FRANK Board Member 20.5% of Rev
TANYA SALMAN Board President —
KARI KASTENHOLZ Secretary —
ANNA MARIA MYKLEBUST Board President —
LAURIE FELLENZ Board Member —
ALYSSA KUBISHAK Treasurer —
KARI WALTON Board Member —
EMILY WHALLEY Board Member —
Tanya Salman Board President —
Kari Kastenholz Secretary —
Anna Maria Myklebust Board President —
Laurie Fellenz thru Dec 2022 Board Member —
Alyssa Kubishak Treasurer —
Kari Engleson thru Dec 2022 Board Member —
Emily Whalley Board Member —
Kaitlyn Konrardy Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SAIRA FRANK Board Member 13.1% of Rev
TANYA SALMAN Board President —
KARI KASTENHOLZ Secretary —
ANNA MARIA MYKLEBUST Board President —
LAURIE FELLENZ Board Member —
ALYSSA KUBISHAK Treasurer —
SHAWN WEBER MCMAHON Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SAIRA FRANK Board Member 17.1% of Rev
SUSAN GOERES Board President —
KARI KASTENHOLZ Secretary —
ANNA MARIA MYKLEBUST Board President —
LAURIE FELLENZ Board Member —
TANYA SALMAN Treasurer —
SHAWN WEBER MCMAHON Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
15 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
30 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 182 other orgs in WI with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 41 points below the peer median (15 vs. 56).

5-year trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 27.8% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~12 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.