Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Compensation Escalation Cycle

What does this mean?

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

The Path Forward

The Steward

Re-establishes board supremacy over executive extraction. It freezes compensation and mandates that all future financial rewards be tied strictly to verifiable mission expansion.

The Steward
The Steward
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle
Overall
30
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
15
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Compensation Escalation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 27.8% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2022 22.1% 39 Fragile Gov Risk
2021 29.0% 38 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2020 14.8% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2019 16.4% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 14.3% 41 Financially Distressed Recovery
2017 15.2% 39 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2016 11.7% 45 Fragile Recovery
2015 20.1% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2014 19.2% 35 Fragile Gov Risk
2013 18.7% 37 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 17.7% 37 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Saira Frank Executive Dir. 27.4% of Rev
Kari Kastenholz Board President
Alyssa Kubishak Treasurer
Emily Whalley Board President
Kaitlyn Konrardy Secretary
David Coe Board Member
Cheryl Bensman-Rowe Board Member
Julia Valgento Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Saira Frank Executive Dir. 27.6% of Rev
SAIRA FRANK Board Member 20.5% of Rev
TANYA SALMAN Board President
KARI KASTENHOLZ Secretary
ANNA MARIA MYKLEBUST Board President
LAURIE FELLENZ Board Member
ALYSSA KUBISHAK Treasurer
KARI WALTON Board Member
EMILY WHALLEY Board Member
Tanya Salman Board President
Kari Kastenholz Secretary
Anna Maria Myklebust Board President
Laurie Fellenz thru Dec 2022 Board Member
Alyssa Kubishak Treasurer
Kari Engleson thru Dec 2022 Board Member
Emily Whalley Board Member
Kaitlyn Konrardy Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SAIRA FRANK Board Member 13.1% of Rev
TANYA SALMAN Board President
KARI KASTENHOLZ Secretary
ANNA MARIA MYKLEBUST Board President
LAURIE FELLENZ Board Member
ALYSSA KUBISHAK Treasurer
SHAWN WEBER MCMAHON Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SAIRA FRANK Board Member 17.1% of Rev
SUSAN GOERES Board President
KARI KASTENHOLZ Secretary
ANNA MARIA MYKLEBUST Board President
LAURIE FELLENZ Board Member
TANYA SALMAN Treasurer
SHAWN WEBER MCMAHON Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
15 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
30 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 103 other orgs in WI with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 22 points below the peer median (15 vs. 37).

5-year trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 27.8% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~12 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.