Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Compensation Escalation Cycle

What does this mean?

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

The Path Forward

The Steward

Re-establishes board supremacy over executive extraction. It freezes compensation and mandates that all future financial rewards be tied strictly to verifiable mission expansion.

The Steward
The Steward
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle ↓
Overall
32
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
15
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Compensation Escalation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden 33.0% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2022 — — 15.3% 47 Fragile Recovery
2021 — — 25.7% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2020 — — 29.3% 36 Fragile Gov Risk
2019 — — 17.5% 37 Fragile Recovery
2018 — — 18.2% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2017 — — 28.7% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2016 — — 31.7% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2015 — — 29.4% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2014 — — 28.4% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2013 — — 31.0% 25 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2012 — — 32.6% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2011 — — 14.6% 39 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Amy Thomas Executive Dir. 24.4% of Rev
STEPHANIE MILLER-LAMB THRU 10424 Executive Dir. 20.8% of Rev
CAROL MURPHY Treasurer —
JEANINE KISS Secretary —
SHARON CHAIKLIN Board Member —
JANE WILSON CATHCART Board Member —
Marthea Fox Board Member —
Natasha Killian Board President —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
AMANDA WERHANE OPERATIONS MANAGER 17.2% of Rev
JODI LEGGE Board Member 1.7% of Rev
CAROL MURPHY Board President —
AMY BENNETT Treasurer —
SHARON CHAIKLIN Board Member —
JANE WILSON CATHCART Board Member —
JEANINE KISS Board Member —
ROBYN LENDING HALSTEN Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
AMANDA WERHANE OPERATIONS MANAGER 17.7% of Rev
JEANINE KISS Board Member 2.3% of Rev
CAROL MURPHY Board President —
AMY BENNETT Treasurer —
SHARON CHAIKLIN Board Member —
JANE WILSON CATHCART Board Member —
ROBYN LENDING HALSTEN Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
AMANDA WERHANE Board Member 17.5% of Rev
LAURA ROGERS Board Member 15.1% of Rev
CAROL MURPHY Board President —
AMY BENNETT Treasurer —
SHARON CHAIKLIN Board Member —
JANE WILSON CATHCART Board Member —
RENEE LAUBER Board Member —
ROBYN LENDING HALSTEN Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
15 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
32 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 182 other orgs in WI with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 41 points below the peer median (15 vs. 56).

5-year trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 33.0% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~22 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.