Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Acute Resource Divergence

What does this mean?

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

The Path Forward

The Realignment

Forces immediate balancing of administrative bloat against actual programmatic output. It demands that every dollar extracted for overhead be justified by community impact.

The Realignment
The Realignment
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Acute Resource Divergence ↑
Overall
35
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
25
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Resource Divergence

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden 19.4% 35 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2023 — — — 39 Fragile Gov Risk
2022 — — 8.2% 49 Fragile Recovery
2021 — — 19.4% 38 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2020 — — 13.4% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 — — 9.8% 46 Fragile Decline Risk
2018 — — 8.3% 50 Fragile Recovery
2017 — — — 61 Stable Decline Risk
2016 — — — 65 Stable Stable Watch
2015 — — — 65 Stable Stable Watch
2014 — — — 57 Fragile Decline Risk
2013 — — — 61 Stable Stable Watch
2012 — — — 61 Stable Stable Watch
2011 — — — 57 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SALLY KISSNER Executive Director 19.4% of Rev
DALE DAHL Board Member —
JOHN GETHERS Board Member —
GALE JACKSON Board Member —
JEN LUDWICZAK Board Member —
JOYCE REJRET Board Member —
DIANE SCHROEDER Board Member —
SHELLY SMOLAREK Board Member —
ROBERTA STEWARD Board President —
WENDY ERON Board Member —
PETE ROGOSKI Treasurer —
JAN FISHER Secretary —
SUE AKEY Board Member —
BARB ANDERSON Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SALLY KISNER EXECUTIVE DI 10.6% of Rev
WENDY ERON Board President —
JAN FISHER Board Member —
BARB HERREID Secretary —
JOHN KUEHL Board Member —
PETE ROGOSKI Board Member —
LISA SKIBBA Board Member —
NANCY SKORCZEWSKI Board Member —
ROBERTA STEWART Board Member —
CRAIG TIMM Treasurer —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SALLY KISNER Executive Director 10.6% of Rev
ROBERTA STEWART Board Member —
CAL KAUFMAN Treasurer —
BARB HERREID Secretary —
WENDY ERON Board President —
JIM LUCAS Board Member —
LISA SKIBBA Board Member —
NANCY SKORCZEWSKI Board Member —
NATHANIEL SPRINGER Board Member —
PAM MCCARVILLE Board President —
CRAIG TIMM Board Member —
LEE STEINHILBER Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SALLY KISNER Executive Director 9.1% of Rev
ROBERTA STEWART Board Member —
CAL KAUFMAN Treasurer —
BARB HERREID Secretary —
WENDY ERON Board President —
JIM LUCAS Board Member —
ERIC BRITTNACHER Board Member —
NANCY SKORCZEWSKI Board Member —
TED MOSKONAS Board Member —
PAM MCCARVILLE Board President —
CONNIE SOUBA Board Member —
LEE STEINHILBER Board Member —
JOHN VAN DE LOOP Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
25 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
35 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 94 other orgs in WI with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 48 points below the peer median (25 vs. 73).

5-year trend: Acute Resource Divergence

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.