Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
54
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 8.3% 54 Fragile Recovery
2022 16.8% 41 Fragile Gov Risk
2021 15.8% 47 Fragile Recovery
2020 15.9% 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2019 13.8% 45 Fragile Decline Risk
2018 5.7% 54 Fragile Recovery
2017 12.7% 52 Fragile Recovery
2016 9.5% 52 Fragile Decline Risk
2015 7.3% 54 Fragile Recovery
2014 10.9% 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 9.9% 54 Fragile Recovery
2012 11.8% 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 11.6% 52 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Marie Fritz Perry Executive Director 8.1% of Rev
Carrie Blum Board Member
Janelle Massey Board Member
Jane Monahan Board Member
Dan Wegmueller Board Member
Jane Sybers Board Member
Hans Bernet Board Member
Ryan Ziltner Board Member
Christine Wellington Board President
Mike Sanders Board President
Julie Wilke Treasurer

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Kathy Hennessy Executive Director 8.3% of Rev
Carrie Blum Board Member
Janelle Massey Board Member
Kathy Hennessy Executive Dir.
Robert Rudd Board Member
Jane Monahan Board Member
Dan Wegmueller Board Member
Jane Sybers Board Member
Hans Bernet Board Member
Ryan Ziltner Board Member
Christine Wellington Board President
Mike Sanders Board President
Julie Wilke Treasurer

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Kathy Hennessy Executive Director 7.5% of Rev
Christine Wellington Board Member
Rebecca Gilman Board Member
Wendy Weiler Erb Board Member
Greg Fedders Secretary
Kathy Hennessy Executive Dir.
Robert Rudd Board Member
Mike Sanders Board Member
Dan Wegmueller Board Member
Hans Bernet Board Member
Julie Buchanan Board Member
Marc Farmer Board Member
Ryan Ziltner Board Member
Kevin Callahan Board President
John Baumann Board President
Julie Wilke Treasurer

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Kathy Hennessy Executive Director 7.6% of Rev
Christine Wellington Board Member
Rebecca Gilman Board Member
Wendy Weiler Erb Board Member
Greg Fedders Secretary
Kathy Hennessy Executive Dir.
Robert Rudd Board Member
Mike Sanders Board Member
Dan Wegmueller Board Member
Hans Bernet Board Member
Julie Buchanan Board Member
Marc Farmer Board Member
Ryan Ziltner Board Member
Kevin Callahan Board President
John Baumann Board President
Julie Wilke Treasurer

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Kathy Hennessy Executive Director 7.4% of Rev
Mary Soddy Board Member
Wendy Weiler Erb Board Member
Christine Wellington Board President
Ryan Ziltner Board Member
Rebecca Gilman Board Member
Kevin Callahan Board President
John Baumann Board President
Julie Wilke Treasurer
Sue Barrett Board Member
Hans Bernet Board President
Julie Buchanan Board Member
Robert Rudd Board Member
Marc Farmer Board Member
Greg Fedders Secretary
John Glynn Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
54 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 20 other orgs in WI with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 31 points above the peer median (60 vs. 29).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.